IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA.
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Naisha Arora – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP(M) No.215 of 2025
Decided on : 05-03-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 29-61-85 - Bail application during trial - Applicant seeks bail claiming false implication and completion of investigation - Police report indicates recovery of 5.30 gms of heroin, not constituting commercial quantity - Court finds presumption of innocence applicable, and pre-trial punishment prohibited - Applicant's age and lack of criminal history considered - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1, 16, 17, 23)
(B) Bail - Conditions for release - Court emphasizes the need for the applicant to comply with conditions to ensure trial integrity and prevent tampering with evidence. (Paras 25, 26)
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
By way of the present application, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), applicant-Naisha Arora has sought her release, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case FIR No.201 of 2024, dated 24.11.2024, registered under Sections 21, 29-61-85 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station Kangra, District Kangra, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, she has falsely been implicated, in the present case and has been arrested by the police with allegedly possessing 5.30 gms of chitta/heroin and she has termed the case as false and connected one.
3. As per applicant, the investigation is complete and according to her, no useful purpose would be served by keeping her in the judicial custody, that too, for the indefinite period.
4. According to the applicant, she had earlier tried her luck by moving similar application, before the Court of learned Special Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. However, the same was dismissed vide order dated 20.12.2024.
5. Apart from this, Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
6. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.
7. When, put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 24.11.2024, HC Viraj Sharma (Investigating Officer), Police Station, Kangra, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty, as well as, the duty to detect the crime, relating to excise and narcotics.
8. It is the further case of the police that at about 11:00 pm, at a place known as Ghat Purana Kangra, near Hanuman Temple, he has put the picketing to check the vehicles. When, he was checking vehicles No.HP01-DA-4506 and HP37-A-1250, then, he noticed that a car, being driven by its driver, came from Samela side, to which, he gave signal to stop. Consequently, the said vehicle was stopped on the left side of the road. The registration number of the vehicle was found to be HR21-R-1523 make Baleno. Apart from the driver, a lady was also found, sitting in the said car.
9. It is the further case of the police that thereafter, on enquiry, driver of the car disclosed his name as Sahil Sharma, whereas, the lady, sitting on the co-passenger seat, disclosed her name as Naisha Arora (applicant). Both of them have introduced themselves as a couple. Thereafter, the driver of the car was directed to show the requisite papers and also to open the boot of the vehicle for checking, upon which, driver, as well as, the said lady got perplexed and driver disclosed that they had obtained the vehicle on rent from Kharar (Punjab) and they could not show any requisite documents.
10. It is the further case of the police that when, the driver of the car shown his inability to produce any requisite documents, then, Investigating Officer developed suspicion upon them and in order to search the vehicle, he had called Suman Verma, Panch, Ward No.2, MC Kangra and Anil Kumar, R/o Old Kangra and requested them to come present at the spot, upon which, both of them reached at the spot. Both were associated in the investigation of the case. During the search of the vehicle, granule shaped substance was found, which, on checking, on drug detection kit, was found to be 5.30 grams of heroin/chitta and the same was taken into possession. Other codal formalities were completed.
11. After registration of the FIR, the police has arrested the accused persons.
12. The contraband, so recovered, was sent to SFSL, Junga, after complying with the provisions of Section 52A of the NDPS Act and after receiving positive report from there, the police has filed the chargesheet (challan), in the Court of lear
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the quantity of contraband does not meet the threshold for commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Bail can be granted to women under NDPS provisions when charges do not involve commercial quantities and sufficient conditions are set to ensure judicial process integrity.
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
The presumption of innocence applies in bail applications, and previous unconvicted offenses do not automatically justify denial of bail.
The absence of 'commercial quantity' in drug possession negates the application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, allowing for bail and preserving the presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence remains until conviction, and bail may be granted based on parity with co-accused and absence of commercial quantity of contraband.
The court allowed bail for applicants, ruling that the alleged amount of contraband did not meet the definition of 'commercial quantity', and emphasized the presumption of innocence and potential adv....
The court granted bail to young applicants under the NDPS Act, emphasizing their innocence, the absence of prior cases, and the completion of investigation, while imposing conditions to ensure compli....
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited, and the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, allowing bail when investigation is complete and no prior cases exist.
The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail as the quantity of contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, thus Section 37 of the NDPS Act is inapplicable, and the presumption of in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.