IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vikrant Chaudhary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioner-Mukesh Kumar has filed the present Criminal Revision Petition against the judgment dated 24.11.2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.43 of 2023, titled as ‘Mukesh Kumar Vs. Vikrant Chaudhary’.
2. By way of judgment dated 24.11.2023, the learned First Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, filed by the petitioner, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.05.2023, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Manali, District Kullu, H.P. (hereinafter called as the trial Court), in Complaint No.172/2021, titled as ‘Vikrant Choudhary Vs. Mukesh Kumar’.
3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.05.2023, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,85,000/- (Rs.3,00,000/- cheque amount (+) Rs.35,000/- for sufferings (–) Rs.1,50
Settlement between parties allows for compounding of offences under Section 147 of the NI Act, leading to acquittal.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the procedural requirements for such compounding.
Amicable settlement between parties allows for compounding of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to the setting aside of conviction.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded post-conviction if the parties reach a settlement, subject to the payment of a compounding fee.
Amicable settlement between parties allows for compounding of offences under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, subject to payment of a compounding fee.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the matter, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolution.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled the dispute, emphasizing the role of mutual agreement in such cases.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act based on a settlement between the parties, emphasizing the significance of amicable resolutions.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, quashing the conviction upon settlement between the parties.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled their dispute, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.