IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Mr. Justice Virender Singh, J
Desh Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Applicant-Desh Raj is apprehending his arrest in case FIR No. 9 of 2025, dated 19th March, 2025, registered with Police Station New Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., under Sections 108 and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘ BNS ’).
2. By way of the present application, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘ BNSS ’), indulgence of this Court has been sought, by the applicant, to direct the Investigating Officer/Police of Police Station New Shimla, District Shimla, to release him, on bail, in the event of his arrest, in the above-noted case/FIR.
3. According to the applicant, the said FIR has been lodged, at the instance of the wife of Shri Vimal Negi, whose dead body was found in Bhakra Dam.
4. It has been averred in the bail application that as per the allegations, the husband of the complainant was being tortured mentally by the superior officers of the Power Corporation, especially, Director (Electrical) and Managing Director. The allegations of misbehave with deceased Vimal Negi are also stated to have been alleged by the wife of the deceased.
5. According to the applica
The court ruled that anticipatory bail is not warranted due to serious allegations of mental harassment and the risk of tampering with evidence and witnesses.
Anticipatory bail granted in abetment of suicide case: mere workplace harassment without proximate incitement insufficient; parity with co-accused; no mini-trial at bail stage despite ongoing investi....
The court emphasized that bail should not be denied as a form of punishment, and the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty.
The presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, and bail should not be denied as a form of punishment before trial conclusion.
The court emphasized that custodial violence is a serious issue and denied bail due to the applicant's involvement in the alleged crime and previous dismissals of bail applications.
The court established that pre-trial detention is prohibited, emphasizing the need for bail when the trial is unlikely to commence soon and conditions are imposed to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail to the applicants, emphasizing that continued custody was unnecessary due to completed investigation and similar treatment of co-accused.
Bail cannot be denied as a punitive measure; the prosecution must establish its case independently, and the completion of investigation warrants release.
The court denied bail based on the severity of charges against the applicant, his status as an absconder, and the potential risk of witness coercion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.