SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 855

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 
Vivek Singh Thakur, Ranjan Sharma, JJ.
State of H.P. - Appellant
Vs.
Fedru Ram (deceased) through LRs. - Respondents
LPA No.126 of 2025
Decided On : 28-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General.

The State must adhere to legal procedures for land acquisition and ensure timely compensation, dismissing appeals based on delay without merit.

Headnote:

(A) Land Acquisition Act, 2013 - Sections 4 and 6 - Writ petition allowed directing State to initiate acquisition proceedings for land utilized for road construction without proper acquisition - Court emphasized the need for timely compensation and adherence to legal procedures. (Paras 1, 4, 10)

(B) Delay and Laches - The State's appeal based on delay was dismissed as the court found no merit in the argument, reaffirming the principle that timely compensation is essential in land acquisition cases. (Paras 3, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners' land was utilized by the State for road construction in 1995-96 without proper acquisition, prompting them to seek compensation.

Findings of Court:
The court found no illegality in the Single Judge's order and directed the State to complete acquisition formalities within six months.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners were entitled to relief despite the delay and the legality of the State's actions regarding land acquisition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the State must adhere to legal procedures for land acquisition and ensure timely compensation, dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

This appeal has been preferred by the State against judgment dated 18.04.2023, passed in CWP No.4484 of 2019, titled Fedru Ram (since deceased) through LRs and others v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, whereby learned Single Judge has allowed the petition, directing the appellants-State to initiate acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the respondents, utilized by the State for construction of road, namely “Udho-Niwas-Jakhar-Bartul”. Operative portion of the judgment reads as under:

“4. That being the case and further taking into consideration the fact that the grievance of the petitioner in the present case is also that their land was utilized in the year 1995-96 for the purpose of construction of Udho-Niwas-Jakhar-Bartu Road, in Tehsil Rohru, District Shimla H.P. without acquiring the same in accordance with law, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the directions passed by Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court in CWP No. 74 of 2019, as affirmed by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 155 of 2022, shall be construed to have been passed in the present case also and the respondents are directed to take steps to acquire the land the petitioners, which has been utilized for the purpose of construction of Udho-Niwas- Jakhar-Bartu, in Tehsil Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. and due and admissible compensation be paid to the petitioners by completing formalities within a period of six months. It goes without saying that in view of this order passed by the Court, the order passed by the competent authority, i.e. office order dated 29.09.2022 is hereby quashed and set aside.”

2. Parties to the lis are being referred as per their status in the writ petition.

3. Present appeal has been filed on the ground that the petitioners were not entitled for relief on the ground of delay and latches.

4. It is undisputed that land of the petitioner was utilized by the State for construction “Udho-Niwas-Jakhar-Bartu” road, through the Public Works Department, and the petitioner had approached the Court seeking direction to the respondents to pay compensation for the land utilized for construction of aforesaid road.

5. Learned Single Judge, after taking into consideration decision of this High Court in CWP No. 74 of 2019 titled Hem Raj Mehta and others vs. State of HP affirmed by Division Bench of this High Court in LPA No. 155 of 2024.

6. Similar view has been taken in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Umed Ram Sharma, (1986) 2 SCC 68; State of Maharashtra v. Digambar, (1995) 4 SCC 683; Swaraj Abhiyan (I) vs. Union of India and Ors. (2016)7 SCC 498; Vidya Devi v. State of H.P. and others, (2020) 2 SCC 569; Hari Krishana Mandir Trust v. State of Maharashtra and others, (2020) 9 SCC 356; D.B. Basnett vs Collector East District, Gangtok, Sikkim and Anr., (2020)4 SCC 572; B.K. Ravichandra and Ors vs. Union of India & Ors. (2021)14 SCC 503; and Sukh Dutt Ratra and another v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, (2022) 7 SCC 508; Civil Appeal No.1278 of 2023, State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajiv and another, decided on 24.2.2023, as well as judgments passed by this Court in CWP No.5928 of 2022, titled Vir Sain v. State of H.P. and others; and CWP No.1966 of 2010, decided on 12th September, 2013, titled Shankar Dass v. State of Himachal Pradesh.

7. In similar matters, identical appeals have been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court passed in LPA No.40 of 2024, titled State of HP vs. Ramesh Kumar, decided on 27th February, 2024; LPA No.24 of 2019, titled as State of HP vs. Baldev Singh and others, decided on 27th March, 2024; LPA No.144 of 2024, titled State of HP vs. Karam Singh, decided on 27th May, 2024; LPA No.151 of 2024, titled State of HP vs. Prem Nath, decided on 12th June, 2024; LPA No.154 of 2024, titled State of HP vs. Sohan Lal, decided on 14th June, 2024; LPA No.177 of 2024, titled State of HP vs. Satdev Sharma & others, decided on 1st July, 2024; LPA No.230 of 2024, titl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top