Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
State of H.P. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.08.2010, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Kangra at Dharamshala (learned Trial Court), vide which the respondent (accused before the learned Trial Court) was acquitted of the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC). (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the informant, Ramesh Chand (PW-1), was carrying out the construction of Suresh Bakshi’s building. A motorcycle bearing registration No. HP37-2108 came from Tang at a high speed at 4:45 p.m. Two persons were riding the motorcycle. Dulo Ram (since deceased) was coming from Narwana Bazar with a gunny bag on his head. The motorcycle hit Dulo Ram, and he fell on the road. Motorcycle riders stopped the motorcycle at some distance and ran away from the spot. The informant and other persons reached the spot.They found that Dulo Ram had sustained injuries. He subsequently succumbed to his injuries. The accident occurred due to
Negligence in vehicular accidents must be proven beyond mere assertions of speed; the prosecution bears the burden of establishing culpability.
The prosecution must prove negligence or rashness beyond reasonable doubt; mere high speed does not suffice to establish liability.
In acquittal appeals, no interference unless perverse; 'high speed' without quantification or collision corroboration fails to prove rash/negligent driving; trial court's reasonable view upheld.
Appellate courts must respect acquittals unless the trial court's findings are unsupported by evidence or legally flawed, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and the need for substantial and compelling reasons to overturn a trial court's acquittal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
