SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1096

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Jitender - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP(M) No. 2786 of 2024
Decided On : 10-01-2025


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Karun Negi.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vishav Deep Sharma, Addl. A.G.

Prolonged incarceration without trial infringes the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21, requiring bail to be granted in cases of no substantive evidence against the accused and excessive delays in trial.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 15 and 29 - Bail application for accused after prolonged incarceration and alleged participation in the transportation of commercial quantity of contraband dismissed due to lack of direct evidence against the petitioner - The accused had been in custody since 14.09.2023, facing an ongoing trial with no likelihood of prompt resolution. (Paras 1, 10, 11)

(B) Principles for Grant of Bail - The court emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is an exception; prolonged incarceration without trial violates the right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution - The provisions regarding bail in special enactments like the NDPS Act yield when there is excessive delay in the trial. (Paras 10, 11)

(C) Rights of the Accused - Accused's absence of past criminal antecedents, no material evidence connecting him to the crime, and the situation of co-accused being granted bail were considered favorable factors for the petitioner’s release. (Paras 12, 13)

(D) Conditions for Bail - The petitioner was directed to furnish a bond and comply with specific conditions to mitigate any potential risks post-release, emphasizing judicial oversight of his conduct. (Paras 18)

Table of Content
1. overview of bail petition context. (Para 2)
2. details surrounding detention and recovery of contraband. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments presented by the bail petitioner. (Para 5 , 6)
4. state's position and evidence reviewed. (Para 7 , 8)
5. legal provisions and criteria for bail assessment. (Para 9 , 10)
6. supreme court's observations on bail standards. (Para 11 , 12)
7. comments on personal liberties and trial delays. (Para 13 , 14)
8. final bail order issued by the court. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Bail petitioner, Jitender [being in custody 14.09.2023] has come up before this Court seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C] originating from F.I.R. No. 148 of 2023 dated 14.09.2023, under Section 15 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (referred to as the NDPS Act) registered with Police Station Majra, District Sirmour, (H.P.)

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. Case set up by Mr. Karun Negi, Learned Counsel for the bail petitioner [Jitender] is that on 14.09.2023 police party received an information at about 10.20 a.m that a White Creta Hundai Car bearing registration No. HR14P-9300 was carrying contraband. On receipt of information, Nakka was laid at about 11.15 a.m at NH-07 near HPCL Petrol Pump when the car HR14P-9300 being driven by accused Jitender was intercepted by the patrolling party and Poppy husk/Chura Post weighing 54.402 Kg was recovered from gunny bags in the car. Consequently, other codal formalities were completed and the bail petitioner Jitender [driver] alongwith other co-accused, namely, Vishal Sharma, Shambhu Lal and Sattu Joggi were arrested by police on14.09.2023.

2(i) In above backdrop, the case of the bail petitioner, Jitender, is that there is no iota of evidence against the petitioner. It is further averred that the bail petitioner has not committed any offence and he is not connected with the same and is not guilty in any manner. It is further averred that no contraband was recovered from the exclusive and conscious possession of the bail petitioner. It is further averred that the petitioner is facing incarceration since 14.09.2023 i.e.for last more than one year and four months now.

2(ii). It is further averred that the petitioner joined the Investigation and no recovery is pending from the bail petitioner. It is averred that pursuant to Investigation the Challan-Final Police Report has been presented before jurisdictional Court. Petitioner has furnished the undertaking that in case he is released on bail, the bail petitioner shall join the trial and shall not cause any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case and shall abide by such terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court. It is averred that the bail petitioner had filed a bail application before Learned Special Judge-II, Sirmaur District at Nahan in CIS Case No. 3 of 2024, which was dismissed by Learned Special Judge on 08.04.2024 [Annexure P-3]. It is further averred that after dismissal of the bail application before Learned Special Judge bail petitioner [Jitender], had filed an application for regular bail i.e. Cr.MP(M) No. 396 of 2024 before this Court, which was withdrawn on 06.03.2024 [Annexure P-2]. After withdrawal of the petition, the bail petitioner filed the instant bail application. It is averred that bail petitioner is 31 years of age and he undertakes not to flee away from justice.

With these averments, the claim for bail has been preferred before this Court.

STAND OF STATE AUTHORITIES IN STATUS REPORT:

3. Pursuance to issuance of notice, the State Authorities have filed the Status Report dated 06.01.2025 on Instructions of SHO Police Station, Sirmaur [H.P].

3(i). Perusal of Status Report indicates the sequence of events that four accused, namely, Jitender [driver] [bail petitioner], Vishal Sharma, Shambhu Lal and Sattu Joggi were travelling in White Creta Hundai Car bearing registration No. HR14P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top