SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 581

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Appellant.
Versus
Chaman Lal and another - Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No.272 of 2012.
Decided on : 13-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. I.N. Mehta and Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate Generals with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate General.
For the Respondents:Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate

In appeals against acquittal, the presumption of innocence remains unless the lower court's findings are demonstrably perverse or unreasonable.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 15 - Acquittal of respondents for possession of poppy straw - Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; absence of independent witnesses and material contradictions in police statements raised doubts about reliability of evidence. (Paras 1, 6, 23-25, 36)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 313 - In an appeal against acquittal, the court must respect the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's findings are perverse. (Para 36)

Facts of the case:
The police conducted a night naka and claimed to recover poppy straw from the vehicle driven by Chaman Lal and occupied by Har Pal Singh. The respondents fled, and inconsistencies in police testimony led to doubts about the evidence. (Paras 2-4)

Findings of Court:
The learned Special Judge acquitted the respondents due to insufficiency of evidence and raised doubts on the prosecution's narrative. (Paras 5, 36)

Issues: The primary issues revolved around the credibility of police evidence, the lack of independent witnesses, and the plausibility of the respondents fleeing the scene under the circumstances. (Paras 23-24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the acquittal by emphasizing that the prosecution did not prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and that the trial court's conclusions were reasonable based on the presented evidence. (Paras 36-37)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of prosecution's case against respondents. (Para 1 , 2)
2. prosecution’s credibility questioned due to procedural discrepancies. (Para 8 , 22 , 23 , 25)
3. inconsistencies in police witness testimonies diminish prosecution's case. (Para 24)
4. questionable actions of police lead to doubts about evidence handling. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
5. unclear seals imply uncertainty about evidence connection. (Para 32 , 34)
6. presumption of innocence upheld; acquittal affirmed. (Para 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

The respondents have been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short ‘ND&PS Act’) by the learned Special Judge and, aggrieved thereby, the State has filed the instant appeal.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 22.03.2010 at about 11.30 p.m., Inspector Baldev Thakur, the then S.H.O., Police Station, Darlaghat, LHC Kamla Devi, HHC Ram Lal, Constable Mast Ram and driver Sunil Kumar along with an official vehicle had set up a ‘naka’ at Darla Chowk. At about 11.30 p.m., an Alto Car (A/F) of black colour came from the Police Station, Darlaghat side which was singalled to stop and a gunny bag was found lying on the backseat of the car. On being asked, the driver of the vehicle disclosed his name as Chaman Lal (respondent No.1) and another person occupying the front useat disclosed his name as Har Pal Singh (respondent No.2). They were asked to show the papers of the vehicle. The driver of the vehicle agreed to show the documents but instead of showing the same, his driver i.e. respondent No.1 drove thhe vehicle towards Chhamla. The police party chased the vehicle with the official vehicle. At a place known as ‘Dori Ki Bawri’, when the police party was about to apprehend the vehicle, respondent No.2 threw the gunny bag out of the moving car. The said bag on search was found to be containing poppy straw. However, since no independent witness was available, therefore, HHC Ram Lal was deputed to bring scale from Darlaghat. Accordingly, HHC Ram Lal brought an electronic scale and then poppy straw that was recovered was weighed and found to be 15 Kg 600 grams. The gunny bag was packed in a white colour bag and sealed with 9 seals of capital ‘A’. NCB forms in triplicate were filled in on the spot. Facsimile of seal ‘A’ was taken on NCB form. Sample seal was separately taken on a piece of cloth and seal after use was handed over to LHC Kamla. Ruka was scribed and sent to the police station through HHC Ram Lal on the basis of which FIR No.31 dated 23.03.2010 was registered at Police Station, Darlaghat. The spot was inspected and site plan was accordingly prepared. The police party started the search for the vehicle as well as respondents. The black colour Alto Caur was found parked outside the house of respondent Chaman Lal, who handed over the keys of the car to the police. When the car was opened, it was emitting smell of poppy straw and little dust of poppy straw was found to be lying on the bahckseat of the car. Respondent No.1 was arrested and he disclosed that the car was owned by Chinta Lal. The car was taken into possession by the police. The case property was deposited with the MHC. Special report of the case was sent to the SDPO, Darlaghat. Respondent No.2 was arrested on 02.05.2010. Documents of the vehicle were taken into possession by the police. The case property was sent to Laboratory for chemical examination and recovered poppy straw on chemical examination was opined to be sample of poppy straw.

3. After completion of the entire formalities, challan against the respondents was submitted in the Court. They were, later on, charged with the commission of offence punishable under Section 15 of the ND&PS Act on 02.04.2011 to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

4. The prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the respondents examined 16 witnesses in total and thereafter closed its evidence. The respondents w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top