Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Bhumi Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to enhanced gratuity post-retirement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for enhanced gratuity under various rules. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. past judgments relevant for current case. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court directive for timely release of dues. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
1. Notice. Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition, is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed hereinafter.
3. The petitioner, having retired on 31.03.2020 from the post of Driver from the Respondent-Corporation, has filed the writ petition with the following prayer(s):-
“(a) That a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directions may kindly be issued directing the respondents to release the revised higher amount of gratuity and leave encashment in favour of the petitioner in terms of the revised pay rules as well as the payment of gratuity (amendment) Act, 2018 alongwith interest @ 9% per annum.
(b) That a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directions may kin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
