Hari Singh vs Rup Singh - 2026 Supreme(HP) 204

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(HP) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ROMESH VERMA
Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rup Singh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Hamender Singh Chandel
For the Respondent: Devender K. Sharma

Table of Content
1. appeal challenges appellate injunction on disputed land boundary. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. defendants allege plaintiff encroached via construction and earth throwing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. plaintiff's oral evidence lacks documents or demarcation proof. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. appellate court improperly relied on unpleaded wajib-ul-arz. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. demarcation report evidences plaintiff's structures on defendants' land. (Para 18 , 19)
6. plaintiff bears burden to prove injunction claim. (Para 20 , 21)
7. revenue records presume beed on khasra 229, unrebutted. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 29)
8. no injunction without clean hands or demarcation appeal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. set aside appellate decree; restore trial court dismissal. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

ROMESH VERMA, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree, dated 05.10.2018, as passed by the learned Additional District Judge-II Mandi in Appeal No. 34/18, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent/plaintiff was allowed and the judgment and decree, dated 29.06.2018 as passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Jr. Div.) Court No.3, Mandi, was set aside and ultimately, the