Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ROMESH VERMA
Lokpriya Buidwell Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Puneet Singh Seehra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff supplied furniture; defendant owes rs.19,90,082/- after payments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant claims full payment, discounts for defects, limitation bar. (Para 5 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. lower courts decreed suit; appeal at admission stage. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. plaintiff witnesses affirm supplies, invoices, outstanding dues. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. defendant witness admits liability despite quality complaints. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. suit within limitation due to court extensions. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. no substantial question; no interference in second appeal. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
ROMESH VERMA, J.
The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Solan, District Solan, HP. dated 13.03.2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the present appellant has been dismissed and the judgment and decree as passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kasauli, District Solan, HP in Civil Suit No. 56/1 of 2015, titled Puneet Singh Seehra vs. M/S Lokpriya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. , dated 25.11.2022 has been affirmed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the present respondent/plaintiff fi
Concurrent findings upholding recovery of outstanding dues based on invoices, accounts, and defense admissions not interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC absent perversity; suit withi....
The court ruled that the suits for recovery of debts were not barred by limitation due to the pandemic, emphasizing the plaintiff's burden of proof and the validity of invoices and documentation asso....
Fraud allegations require specific pleadings with particulars under CPC Order VI Rule 4; vague pleas rejected. Limitation for work recovery runs from contract-specified final bill settlement date. Pr....
In a suit based on invoices, the invoices must be treated as a written contract. If the Defendant raises no genuine triable issues or the defense is frivolous, the Plaintiff shall be entitled to judg....
In contractual disputes, pre-existing communications and legal proceedings can extend the limitation period, while evidence must be assessed on the preponderance of probabilities rather than strict s....
The burden of proof lies on the defendants to provide documentary evidence of full payment, and failure to do so may result in adverse inferences by the Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
