Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Dimpal alias Dimple Dhiman – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commercial quantity charas recovered from petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner claims false implication; state cites prior bail dismissals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. successive bail requires substantial change in circumstances. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. cannot review prior bail orders or deem recovery suspicious. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. no speedy trial violation due to trial progress. (Para 17) |
| 6. ndps section 37 twin conditions mandatory for bail. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. arrest grounds communication applies prospectively. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. petitioner's precedents distinguished as inapplicable. (Para 25) |
| 9. bail petition dismissed; observations limited to bail. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 07 of 2025, dated 07.01.2025, registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Sirmaur, H.P. for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in short ‘NDPS Act’)
2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the police were on patrolling duty on 07.01.2025. They received secret informat
Successive NDPS bail applications require material change in circumstances and Section 37 twin conditions satisfaction; prolonged incarceration or recovery suspicions alone insufficient without such ....
Successive bail applications require a material change in circumstances; mere delay in trial does not meet the statutory conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Grant of bail under the NDPS Act requires meeting specific twin conditions, which were not satisfied, and mere delay in trial does not justify bail unless supported by substantial change in circumsta....
Successive bail applications require material change in circumstances; no review of prior rejections. Belated Article 22(1) non-communication plea after multiple bail denials and red-handed arrest re....
Bail applications must disclose prior criminal history, with courts assessing the risk of re-offending and societal safety when considering bail requests.
Bail in NDPS commercial quantity cases denied unless twin conditions under Section 37 satisfied: reasonable grounds believing accused not guilty and unlikely to commit offence on bail; red-handed arr....
Co-accused's confessional statement to police inadmissible against petitioner; financial transactions insufficient for prima facie nexus in commercial quantity NDPS case, satisfying Section 37 twin c....
Bail denied in commercial quantity NDPS case as twin conditions under Section 37 unsatisfied: reasonable grounds exist to believe petitioner guilty of conscious possession and likely to reoffend, sup....
The court ruled that bail cannot be granted under Section 37 of the NDPS Act unless conditions of proving innocence and minimal risk of reoffending are met, regardless of trial delays.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
