IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Virender Singh, J.
Rakesh Kumar alias Shanu - Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP(M) No. 04 of 2026
Decided On : 24-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. recovery of 13.56 grams non-commercial heroin. (Para 1) |
| 2. investigation complete, false implication, s37 inapplicable. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. multiple prior ndps cases, no convictions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. no indefinite pre-trial custody despite delay. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. rigors of s37 ndps not attracted. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. bail granted with stringent conditions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ApplicantRakesh Kumar alias Shanu has filed the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 144 of 2024, dated 23.11.2024, under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ND&PS Act’), registered with Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, by the police, in this case.
3. According to him, the investigation in the present case is complete and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in the judicial custody.
4. The contraband allegedly recovered in the present case, according to the applicant, does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity, as such, the provisions of Section 37 of ND&PS Act are not applicable, in the present case.
5. The applicant has tried his luck earlier by moving similar application before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., where his application was dismissed as withdrawn on 08.04.2025. Thereafter, he has again approached the learned Special Judge, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., however, his application has been dismissed on 03.07.2025. Subsequently, he moved to this Court by filing Cr.MP(M) No. 2567 of 2025, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 04.11.2025.
6. According to the applicant, apart from the present case, seven other cases have been registered against him, particulars of which, have been mentioned in para No. 9 of the application, which are reproduced, as under:
1. FIR No. 05/2021, dated 11.01.2021, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;
2. FIR No. 104/2021, dated 14.09.2021, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;
3. FIR No. 37/2023 dated 13.03.2023, under Sections 21, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;
4. FIR No. 70/2019, dated 13.11.2019, under Sections 21, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Taragarh, Pathankot, Punjab;
5. FIR No. 134/2019, dated 13.11.2019, under Sections 21, 22, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Div2 Pathankot, Punjab;
6. FIR No. 87/2022, dated 11.05.2022, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.; and
7. FIR No. 18/2017, dated 15.01.2017, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.
7. According to the applicant, although cases have been registered, however, he has not been convicted in any of the case by the competent Court of Law.
8. On the basis of the grounds as taken in the bail application, Sh. Vijender Katoch, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
9. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.
10. When, put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 23.11.2024, HC Dinesh Kumar No. 46, I.O. CIA Staff Nurpur, submitted a rukka to the Police Station Damtal, disclosing therein that on 23.11.2024, he along with other police officials was on patrolling duty in vehicle No. HP38C5260, as well as, duty to detect the crime relating to excise and narcotics. He was in the territorial jurisdiction of Police Station Damtal.
10.1 I.O., alon
Bail granted in non-commercial quantity NDPS case despite multiple prior cases without convictions, due to trial delays causing pre-trial punishment, with conditions mitigating risks.
The court ruled that continued detention is unwarranted when investigation is complete and no prior cases exist against the applicant, emphasizing the presumption of innocence.
Bail granted in NDPS case involving non-commercial quantity contraband: Section 37 rigors inapplicable; presumption of innocence persists despite prior pending cases; no purpose in indefinite custody....
The absence of 'commercial quantity' in drug possession negates the application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, allowing for bail and preserving the presumption of innocence.
Bail can be granted when the accused is a permanent resident, has no prior cases, and the contraband is non-commercial, ensuring conditions are met.
Commercial quantity NDPS bail mandates Section 37 twin conditions: reasonable grounds believing non-guilt and no reoffence likelihood on bail; procedural lapses insufficient for release.
The court ruled that the applicant's possession of poppy husk does not meet the commercial quantity threshold, allowing bail under stringent conditions.
The court held that the absence of commercial quantity under the NDPS Act allows the presumption of innocence, permitting bail despite prior pending cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.