SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Virender Singh, J.
Rakesh Kumar alias Shanu - Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP(M) No. 04 of 2026
Decided On : 24-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Tejasvi Sharma & Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional A.Gs.

Bail granted in non-commercial quantity NDPS case despite multiple prior cases without convictions, due to trial delays causing pre-trial punishment, with conditions mitigating risks.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483; Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 37 - Bail application during trial pendency - Recovery of non-commercial quantity contraband from vehicle dickey - Multiple prior similar cases registered but no convictions - Investigation complete, trial delayed over 15 months with no near-term conclusion - Prolonged custody amounts to pre-trial punishment - Local resident with no flight risk - Section 37 rigors inapplicable - Bail allowed with conditions to mitigate tampering and reoffending risks. (Paras 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
Applicant sought bail in case involving recovery of 13.56 grams light brown-white granular substance testing positive for heroin from scooty dickey during patrolling interception. Prior bail applications withdrawn or dismissed. Seven prior cases under similar provisions registered but no convictions. Police opposed citing prior involvement and risks of reoffending or witness coercion.

Findings of Court:
Applicant ordered released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of regular court attendance, no evidence tampering, no inducement/threats to witnesses, and no leaving territory without permission.

Issues: Whether prior cases without convictions justify denial of bail despite non-commercial quantity; propriety of indefinite custody amid trial delays; sufficiency of conditions for risks.

Ratio Decidendi: Prior cases without convictions or bail cancellation efforts do not warrant indefinite custody; non-commercial quantity exempts from Section 37; trial unlikely to conclude soon post-15 months; pre-trial punishment prohibited; conditions address apprehensions. (Paras 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. recovery of 13.56 grams non-commercial heroin. (Para 1)
2. investigation complete, false implication, s37 inapplicable. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 9)
3. multiple prior ndps cases, no convictions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10)
4. no indefinite pre-trial custody despite delay. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. rigors of s37 ndps not attracted. (Para 15 , 16)
6. bail granted with stringent conditions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.

Applicant­Rakesh Kumar alias Shanu has filed the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 144 of 2024, dated 23.11.2024, under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ND&PS Act’), registered with Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.

2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, by the police, in this case.

3. According to him, the investigation in the present case is complete and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in the judicial custody.

4. The contraband allegedly recovered in the present case, according to the applicant, does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity, as such, the provisions of Section 37 of ND&PS Act are not applicable, in the present case.

5. The applicant has tried his luck earlier by moving similar application before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., where his application was dismissed as withdrawn on 08.04.2025. Thereafter, he has again approached the learned Special Judge, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., however, his application has been dismissed on 03.07.2025. Subsequently, he moved to this Court by filing Cr.MP(M) No. 2567 of 2025, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 04.11.2025.

6. According to the applicant, apart from the present case, seven other cases have been registered against him, particulars of which, have been mentioned in para No. 9 of the application, which are reproduced, as under:­

1. FIR No. 05/2021, dated 11.01.2021, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;

2. FIR No. 104/2021, dated 14.09.2021, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;

3. FIR No. 37/2023 dated 13.03.2023, under Sections 21, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.;

4. FIR No. 70/2019, dated 13.11.2019, under Sections 21, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Taragarh, Pathankot, Punjab;

5. FIR No. 134/2019, dated 13.11.2019, under Sections 21, 22, 29 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Div­2 Pathankot, Punjab;

6. FIR No. 87/2022, dated 11.05.2022, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.; and

7. FIR No. 18/2017, dated 15.01.2017, under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, of Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.

7. According to the applicant, although cases have been registered, however, he has not been convicted in any of the case by the competent Court of Law.

8. On the basis of the grounds as taken in the bail application, Sh. Vijender Katoch, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.

9. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.

10. When, put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 23.11.2024, HC Dinesh Kumar No. 46, I.O. CIA Staff Nurpur, submitted a rukka to the Police Station Damtal, disclosing therein that on 23.11.2024, he along with other police officials was on patrolling duty in vehicle No. HP38C­5260, as well as, duty to detect the crime relating to excise and narcotics. He was in the territorial jurisdiction of Police Station Damtal.

10.1 I.O., alon


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top