SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
Ayansh Srivastav – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No. 106 of 2026
Decided On : 11-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sunil Kumar Banyal
For the Respondent: Ajit Sharma

In NDPS commercial quantity cases, co-accused confessional statements (inadmissible under Evidence Act Section 25 & CrPC 162) and financial transactions alone insufficient to deny bail under Section 37; mere prior association inadequate post-investigation.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 25, 29 & 37 - Cr.P.C. - Section 162 - Indian Evidence Act - Section 25 - Bail application in case of commercial quantity of charas - Petitioner not present at recovery site from intercepted vehicle - Connected only through inadmissible confessional statements of co-accused, financial transactions to co-accused and prior stay with some co-accused (visitors' register & CCTV footage) - Such material insufficient to establish prima facie abetment or complicity - Twin conditions under Section 37 not satisfied - Investigation complete, charge-sheet filed - No fruitful purpose in detention of student without antecedents - Bail granted subject to conditions. (Paras 11-20)

(B) Bail - Principles - Nature of charge, evidence, punishment, antecedents, risk of witness tampering, repetition of offence etc. to be considered - Normal rule is bail, not jail, unless circumstances suggest otherwise - Court to apply mind judiciously without detailed evidence appraisal. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought regular bail in case under NDPS Act for offences involving recovery of over 1 kg charas from vehicle carrying five occupants at police check-point. Petitioner not in vehicle or at spot; implicated via co-accused disclosures, money transfers shortly before incident and common stay prior thereto. Prosecution relied on bank records, visitors' register, CCTV. Charge-sheet filed post investigation.

Findings of Court:
Petition allowed. Petitioner released on bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- with surety, subject to conditions like no witness intimidation, trial attendance, address reporting, passport surrender, mobile/social media details.

Issues: Whether co-accused confessional statements, financial transactions and prior association constitute sufficient material for denying bail under Section 37 NDPS Act rigours in commercial quantity case; applicability of bail principles.

Ratio Decidendi: Confessional statements to police inadmissible against co-accused; financial transactions and mere association do not establish prima facie involvement; post-investigation, no basis for custody when evidence legally insufficient.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. charas recovery from co-accused vehicle; petitioner linked by finances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner alleges false implication; state cites section 37 ndps. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. bail is rule, jail exception; consider offence gravity, antecedents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. co-accused confessions inadmissible under evidence act, crpc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. financial transactions, mere association insufficient for custody. (Para 17 , 18)
6. bail granted post-investigation with strict conditions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in FIR No. 204 of 2025, dated 22.09.2025, registered at Police Station Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the police had set up a naka at Pungh Fourlane, Sundernagar on 22.09.2025. They intercepted a car bearing registration No. UP-16AX-2143. Five people were travelling in the car, who got frightened after seeing the police. The driver prevaricated in the production of the documents. The police became suspicious and checked the car in the presence of Kuldeep Kumar and Mukesh Kumar. They recovered a carry bag containing 1Kg, 174grams of charas. The occupants identified themselves as Divyanash Patel, Nakul Mittal, Arnav Chauhan, Saksham Bharti and Rohit Kumar. The police arrested the occupants and seized the car and charas. The petitioner’s name was not mentioned in the FIR, and he was named by the occupants of the car. There is no evidence against the petitioner. He was apprehended because he was studying in the same university as the occupants, and he had sent Rs.9200/- on 20.09.2025 and Rs.5000/- on 21.09.2025 to the account of co-accused Saksham Bharti. The police have completed the investigation, and no fruitful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody. The petitioner would abide by all the terms and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.

3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report asserting that the police party had set up a nakka at Pungh four-lane and were checking the vehicles on 22.09.2025. They intercepted a vehicle bearing registration No. UP-16AX-2143. The driver and occupants of the vehicle got frightened after seeing the police. The police associated Kuldeep Kumar and Mukesh Kumar as independent witnesses. The police inquired about the names of the occupants of the vehicle. The driver identified himself as Devayas Patel, the person sitting beside him identified himself as Nakul Mittal, and the persons sitting on the rear seat identified themselves as Arnav Chauhan, Saksham Bharti and Rohit Kumar. The police searched the vehicle and recovered a carry bag containing 1174 grams of charas. The police seized the charas and arrested the occupants of the vehicle. The charas was sent to SFSL, Junga, and as per the report of analysis, it was confirmed to be a sample of charas. The occupants revealed during interrogation that they had handed over Rs.5000/- each to Kashin Kashyap, who had also accompanied the co-accused on his motorcycle. They identified the room where they had stayed in Kullu. The bank details of Kashin showed that an amount of Rs.50,000/- was transferred from his mother’s account. Kashin led the police to a bridge constructed on Naulgari Nala at Lag valley. The bank account details of Rewat Ram also showed the receipt of Rs.50,000/-. The police arrested Rewat Ram, who confirmed that he had sold the charas at a place mentioned by Kashin. Rewat Ram also disclosed that he had sold charas to four boys for Rs.50,000/-. The bank detail records of the occupants were also checked. It was found during the investigation that Divyansh Patel, Nakul Mit





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top