SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1379

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
Shabnam - Petitioner 
Versus 
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent 
Cr. MP (M) No. 2001 of 2025 
Decided On : 16-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr Hitesh Chopra, Advocate, and Mr Gaurav Sharma, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General

The court determined that financial transactions alone do not establish involvement in drug trafficking, necessitating prima facie evidence for bail denial.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 27A, and 29 - Bail application - The petitioner was accused based on financial transactions linked to a drug trade; however, the court found insufficient basis for charges of financing or abetting drug activities given no direct connection to drug possession. (Paras 10 to 14)

(B) Bail - Criteria for grant - Court evaluated accused's awareness of transactions related to illegal drug trade and emphasized the need for a prima facie case before denying bail. (Paras 58 to 74)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested due to allegations stemming from familial financial dealings, including money deposited by her father, purportedly linked to drug trafficking activities, without direct evidence of her involvement.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the petitioner did not meet the criteria for detention under Section 27A of the NDPS Act, permitting bail with conditions.

Issues: The court considered whether the allegations and financial transactions amounted to financing the drug trade or abetment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that merely having money deposited in a joint account does not constitute financing drug operations.

Result: Petition allowed; bail granted with conditions.

Table of Content
1. accusation based on financial transactions linking to drug trade. (Para 1 , 2)
2. defense claims innocence; petition opposed due to involvement allegations. (Para 3 , 6)
3. court weighs evidence against bail considerations and definitions. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. conditions for bail set while highlighting the need to protect legal proceedings. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.

The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 127 of 2024, dated 27.10.2024, registered at Police Station, Damtal, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 21 , 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the police apprehended Kamaljeet on 27.10.2024 at about 7:00 pm with 262 grams of heroin. Kamaljeet revealed that he had purchased heroin from Rajesh Lodhi. The police arrested Rajesh Kumar, who disclosed that one Vishal Kumar alias Shalubaliresident of Dubai, used to send heroin to him. He (Rajesh Kumar) would collect money and hand it over to Raj Kumar @ Sethi, who used to hand over the money to Lakhvinder. The police arrested Lakhvinder, who disclosed that he had handed over Rs. 3.00 crores to Gagan Sarna and some money to Mohit Singh alias Toni, an employee of Gaurav Jeweller. Lakhwinder also disclosed that he had deposited some money in his account and some money in the petitioner’s account. The petitioner is Lakhwinder’s daughter. The police arrested the petitioner. She disclosed that she had a joint account with her father, which was being operated by her and Lakhwinder. She was aware of the deposit of Rs. 49,78,845/- in her account by her father. The petitioner was arrested because of the deposit of the money by her father in her account. No recovery was made from the petitioner. The petitioner was not named in the FIR. The petitioner would abide by the terms and conditions which the Court may impose. Hence, the bail petition.

3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report asserting that the police party apprehended Kamaljeet Singh with a carry bag containing 262 grams of heroin on 27.10.2024. The police seized the heroin and arrested Kamaljeet. Kamaljeet revealed during the interrogation that he had purchased the heroin from Rajesh, and he was to deliver it to Rajat Kumar. The police checked call details records and found that he (Rajesh) and Rajat Kumar had been in touch with each other. The police apprehended Rajesh, who revealed that Vishal alias Shalubali, a resident of Dubai, supplies the heroin to him with directions to further supply it to the persons named by him. He used to hand over the money to Rajesh Kumar alias Sethi. The police apprehended Rajesh Kumar alias Sethi, who revealed during the interrogation that he had handed over the money to Lakhvinder Singh as per the directions of Vishal. The police apprehended Lakhvinder, who revealed that he had deposited the money into his account and handed over some of the money to Mohit Singh, an employee of Gaurav Jewellers. He had also handed over about three crores rupees to Gagan Sarna, owner of Gaurav Jeweller. The police arrested Mohit Singh and recovered gold ornaments, currency notes, and investment documents. Lakhwinder disclosed that he had deposited the money in a joint account with the petitioner. The police arrested the petitioner, who revealed that she was married to Saravjeet in the year 2020. She had opened a bank account with her father, Lakhwinder, in the year 2022, which was being operated jointly. Lakhwinder had deposited Rs. 49,78,845/- in the joint account. Lakhwinder had taken ICICI Prudential Policy in the petitioner’s name, and the instalment of Rs. 45.00 lacs was paid by Lakhwinder. Lakhwinder had also opened a Fixed Deposit of Rs. 30.00 lacs in the petitioner’s name. The petitioner has committed an offence punishable under Section 27A of the NDPS Act. The charge shee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top