IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Keshav Dutt Shreedhar – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Kumar Sharma and Others – Respondents
Cr. Rev. No. 345 of 2025
Decided On : 11-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges dismissal of crpc 156(3) fir application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. directors defrauded shareholder via misappropriation and irregularities. (Para 6) |
| 3. trial court dismissed relying on police status report. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. 156(3) crpc requires pre-cognizance prima facie review. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. bnss savings clause mandates crpc for pending proceedings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. 156(3) distinct from 202; pre- vs post-cognizance. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. error: police report improper at 156(3) stage. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. remand trial court for fresh 156(3) crpc decision. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
1. Petitioner has filed the present petition, under Section 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) read with Section 528 of the , against the order dated 2.4.2025, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kangra at Dharamshala, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’) in Cr. MA No. 506 of 2024, titled as Keshav Dutt Shridhar vs. Kamlesh Kumar and Others .
2. By way of the order dated 2.4.2025, the learned trial Court has dismissed the application preferred, by the petitioner, under Section 156(3) Cr.PC, seeking registration of FIR, against respondents No.1 and 2.
3. Vide order dated 01.08.2025, the State has been ordered to be impleaded, as, respondent No.3, in this case, and notice of the petition was ordered to be confined only to respondent No.3-State.
4. Record of the case has been requisitioned.
5. The parties to the present lis are hereinafter referred to, in the same manner, as, were referred to, by the learned trial Court.
6. Brief facts, leading to filing the present petition, before this Court, as, emerge from the record, may be summed up, as under:-
6.1. Complainant Keshav Dutt Shreedhar, has filed an application, under Section 156(3) of the Cr.PC, for registration of the FIR, against respondents No.1 and 2, Kamlesh Kumar Sharma and Nishant Sharma, on the basis of the following facts:-
1. That the complainant is a practising Lawyer of more that forty-40 years of practise and experience and is a designated Senior Advocate of High Court of H.P. at Shimla.
That he has his permanent address as mentioned in the memo of the complaint/application.
2. That, he is as well a director and shareholder in M/S Shri Chamunda Laboratories and Projects Pvt. Ltd. With Regd. Office at A-1/228, Ground Floor, KH No. 1629/1, Phase V, Aya Nagar, Extension, Near Sanjay Tubewell New Delhi- 110047.
3. That, it is worthwhile to mention that Shri Chamunda Laboratories and Projects Pvt. Ltd, is a company incorporated under the relevant provisions of the companies Act having its registered office at A-1/228, Ground Floor, KH No. 1629/1, Phase V, Aya Nagar, Extension, Near Sanjay Tubewell, New Delhi-110047. That the respondent-accused Nos. 1& 2 are the Directors and Shareholders in the company and respondent/accused no. 1 is the father of the accused no. 2.
4. That the complainant/applicant came in contact with the respondents/accused nos. 1 & 2 sometime in the years 2004. That the respondent/accused nos. 1 & 2 in their capacity as Directors of the company represented that the company was engaged in the hospitality business in Himachal Pradesh and successfully running a Hotel under the name and style of Hotel Sai Gardens at Palampur, now having 57 rooms/cottages, restaurants and Banquet.
This, company, as aforestated somewhere in the year 2010, also built a Mega Mall which constituted a commercial space i.e. 23000 sq. feet at Bhagsu Nath, Upper Dharamshala. That due to various circumstances and assurance, which later turned out to be false and misleading and completely incorrect, the applicant/complainant agreed to invest in the company and became a 50% shareholder in the company.
5. That the applicant/complainant besides becoming 50% owner of the company was also offered a seat in the board of the company. That the applicant
Devarapalli Lakshminarayana Reddy & Others vs. V. Narayana Reddy & Others
Under CrPC 156(3) pre-cognizance, Magistrate assesses prima facie case solely from complaint; cannot rely on police report. Pre-BNSS applications proceed under CrPC savings clause (BNSS 531).
The court emphasized the need for investigation into the allegations and the premature nature of the petition for quashing.
A Magistrate has the discretion to direct a police investigation when a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, provided procedural requirements are met. Criminal proceedings should not be quashed ....
A Magistrate cannot register a subsequent complaint under Section 200 CrPC based on the same facts after a previous complaint has been quashed, as it exceeds jurisdiction.
A mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offense unless there is dishonest intention from the outset; judicial mind must be applied before directing police investigation under Section....
The magistrate must ensure a complaint discloses a cognizable offence before directing police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and a detailed affidavit is required to support such applicat....
As per Section 154 of Cr.P.C. object of registration of FIR is that every information relating to cognizance of offence whether or given orally or otherwise officer incharge of police station has to ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the Magistrate to apply judicial mind before directing investigation under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and the wide powers of the Magistrat....
(1) Merely because on same set of facts with same allegations and averments earlier complaint is filed, there is no bar to lodge FIR with police station with same allegations and averments. However, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.