SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1602

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Baldev Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others - Respondent
CWPOA No.3316 of 2020
Decided On : 19-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General

Daily wagers entitled to work charge status after 8 years continuous service with notional pay fixation, annual increments prospectively sans arrears; such service counts for pensionary benefits.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Daily wage employees - Entitlement to work charge status upon completion of 8 years continuous service - Consequential notional benefits of pay fixation in regular time scale w.e.f. date of status and annual increments till regularization and thereafter - Exclusion of past arrears due to retrospective operation limiting relief to notional basis - Initial irregular appointment dehors Articles 14 & 16 - Work charge service countable with regular service for pensionary and retiral benefits. (Paras 7(i), 7(ii), 7(v), 7(vi))

(B) Notional benefits - Scope - Include pay fixation and annual increments prospectively without monetary arrears; denial thereof punitive, violates Fundamental Rule 24 and service conduct rules, defeats judicial mandates. (Paras 7(iii), 7(iii-a), 7(iv))

Facts of the case:
Petitioner appointed daily wage supervisor on 01.01.1995, completed 8 years by 31.01.2003, regularized pursuant to policy on 22.09.2007 (joined 11.10.2007), retired 30.09.2018. Granted work charge status w.e.f. 31.01.2003 during pendency; sought arrears, pay fixation, increments, seniority, pension counting.

Findings of Court:
Work charge status from 31.01.2003 upheld; pay fixation and increments from that date till regularization and re-fixation thereafter; no past arrears; work charge service (31.01.2003 to 10.10.2007) counted with regular service for pensionary benefits revised w.e.f. 01.10.2018; comply by 31.01.2026 or 6% interest.

Issues: Entitlement to retrospective work charge status after 8 years; scope of notional benefits including pay fixation/increments vs arrears; counting work charge service for pension.

Ratio Decidendi: Daily wagers get work charge status after 8 years entitling notional pay benefits prospectively sans arrears per Supreme Court mandates with retrospective effect; increments not deniable absent adverse record; service counts for pension per binding precedents.

Result: Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, Judge

Petitioner, Baldev Singh, initially filed Original Application No.6448 of 2017 before the State Administrative Tribunal and upon abolition of Tribunal, the matter stood transferred to this Court, as CWPOA No.3316 of 2020, seeking the following reliefs :-

“(i). That the respondents be directed to regularize the service of the applicant after 8 years service w.e.f. 01.01.2003 with all consequential benefits i.e. arrear of pay, seniority and pension etc.

(ii). The respondents be directed to grant interest @ 12% per annum from due dates from all monetary benefits to which the applicant is entitled.”

FACTUAL MATRIX:

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed as daily wage Supervisor in Development Block Paragpur, District Kangra, on 01.01.1995 and his services were regularized on 22.09.2007 [Annexure P-2] where he joined on 11.10.2007.

2(i). By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for granting him the regularization or work charge status from the date of completion of 8 years of continuous service w.e.f. 01.01.2003, in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in Rakesh Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others , CWP No.2735 of 2010, decided on 28.07.2010. It is averred that the benefit of work charge status from the date of completion of 8 years of service has been given to one Sh. Kuldeep Kumar, as per [Annexure A-6] and to Santosh Kumar [as mention in Paras 6 and 7 of the petition].

2(ii). In this background, a prayer is made for granting regularization/work charge status [though stated to be a claim for regularization in prayer clause inPara 7(i)] with the prayer for releasing all consequential benefits like pay fixation, seniority, pension etc along with interest.

STAND OF STATE AUTHORITIES IN REPLY- AFFIDAVIT:

3. Pursuant to issuance of notice on 21.12.2017, the State Authorities have filed Reply-Affidavit dated 31.08.2018, of Joint Secretary (RD) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

3(i). Reply-Affidavit admits that the petitioner was initially appointed on daily wage Supervisor in Development Block Paragpur on 01.01.1995 and he had completed 8 years of service as on 01.01.2003 but, since no regularization policy was issued from May, 2002 to 09.06.2006, therefore, the petitioner was regularized after issuance of policy dated 09.06.2006 by the respondents w.e.f. 22.09.2007 prospectively. In Para 6 of the Reply-Affidavit, respondents have stated that the Rural Development Department does not have a work charge establishment and, therefore, the petitioner could not be granted the work charge status by relying upon Para 7 of the judgment in the case of Rakesh Kumar (supra) which stated thatwork charge status is not to be given after establishment ceases to be work charge establishment.

3(ii). So far as the claim of the petitioner for parity with Santosh Kumar is concerned, Reply-Affidavit stated that the aforesaid Santosh Kumar had filed a writ petition and pursuant to the setting aside of his termination, the benefit of regularization from the due date was given to him. Reply-Affidavit further states that the petitioner was regularized after issuance of policy dated 09.06.2006 prospectively, in terms of the conditions in the policy. In this background, prayer was made for dismissing the writ petition.

REBUTTAL-REJOINDER BY THE PETITIONER:

4. Petitioner has filed a rejoinder, reiterating the averments in the writ petition and has claimed work charge status from the date of completion of8 years of continuous service, with all consequential benefits.

STATEMENT MADE BY LEARNED COUNSEL:

5. During the pendency of the writ petition, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Director Rural Development Department has issuedan office order on 23.01.2021 [Taken on Record] whereby, petitioner-Baldev Singh has been granted the work charge status from the date of completion of 8 years of daily wage service w.e.f. 31.01.2003 [Statement Taken on Record].

5(i). Pursuant to issuance o


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top