SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(J&K) 194

NIRMAL SINGH
Naveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Mughal

1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir for a writ of certiorari quashing order dated 21st of May07, vide which the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been rejected. Mandamus is also sought commanding respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds.

2. Father of the petitioner namely Om Parkash, who was serving as Auditor in PCDA(NC), died in harness on 6th of Jan95. The petitioner was minor at that time. On attaining majority, the mother of the petitioner applied to the respondent authorities vide representation dated 24th of Jan07,that her son (petitioner herein), be given compassionate appointment as Gp.C. The respondents after considering the claim of the petitioner in terms of standing Government orders on the subject, rejected the same vide order impugned dt. 21st of May07, and it is this order which is subject matter of challenge in the present petition.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that after the death of his father, his mother filed various representations before the authorities concerned and every time, assurance was given to her that th























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top