1. The writ petitioner, respondent in these appeals, a Munsiff appointed on December 8, 1980, was promoted to the post of Sub-Judge in the year 1988. On July 28, 1994, he was suspended pending inquiry. On October 29, 1994, he received a charge sheet. The same contained eleven charges. He replied the charge sheet by a letter dated December 22, 1994, whereby he denied all eleven charges. The charges were thus inquired into, first by a Honble Judge and later, on his Lordships transfer from this Court to another Court, by another Honble Judge, who concluded the inquiry and submitted his report. On April 10, 1998, the second show cause notice was issued, a copy of the inquiry report was enclosed therewith. The said show cause notice indicated that the Honble Court has agreed with the report of the Inquiry Officer that the charges 8 and 11 stand proved and further the Honble Court has come to the conclusion that charge no. 1 is also proved on evidence. The said show cause, however, did not indicate the reasons to support the said conclusion. The said show cause expressed that the Honble Court has provisionally come to the conclusion that the respondent is not a fit perso