2014 Supreme(J&K) 47
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
HASNAIN MASSODI and BANSI LAL BHAT, JJ.
Mohd. Baksh – Appellant
Vs.
State & others - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2010
Decided On : 24/03/2014
The importance of reliable and unblemished evidence in criminal cases, particularly when relying on the testimony of a sole eyewitness.
Headnote:
MURDER - Criminal Law - S. 302 RPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: S. 302 RPC - The court discussed the evidence and testimonies of witnesses, the post-mortem report, and the conduct of the investigating officer. The court emphasized the importance of reliable and unblemished evidence in criminal cases and highlighted the credibility of the eyewitness testimony. The court also addressed the defense plea of alibi and the lack of corroboration for the extra-judicial confession. The judgment confirmed the guilt of the accused based on the trustworthy evidence presented.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution presented evidence that the accused murdered a woman due to a land dispute with her husband. The eyewitness, the deceased's brother, testified to witnessing the accused assaulting the deceased and locking her in a room before her death. The husband of the deceased also provided testimony regarding the threats made by the accused prior to the incident.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the eyewitness testimony to be reliable and credible, emphasizing the importance of unblemished evidence in criminal cases. The court also addressed the lack of corroboration for the extra-judicial confession and the defense plea of alibi. The judgment confirmed the guilt of the accused based on the trustworthy evidence presented.
Issues: The issues revolved around the reliability of the eyewitness testimony, the lack of corroboration for the extra-judicial confession, and the defense plea of alibi.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of reliable and unblemished evidence in criminal cases, particularly when relying on the testimony of a sole eyewitness. The judgment confirmed the guilt of the accused based on the trustworthy evidence presented.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the confirmation reference was allowed. The judgment confirmed the guilt of the accused based on the trustworthy evidence presented. The court also directed appropriate action against the delinquent conduct of the investigating officer.
BANSI LAL BHAT, J.
This appeal is directed against judgment of conviction dated 27.1.2010 and order of sentence dated 28.1.2010 recorded and passed by learned Sessions Judge, Ramban by virtue whereof the Appellant (hereinafter referred to as the accused) has been held guilty of offence u/S. 302 RPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.10, 000/-; in default of payment of fine to suffer imprisonment for one year. Reference has also been made by learned Sessions Judge for confirmation of sentence. The Appeal and the Confirmation Reference were heard together.
2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 21.9.2005, the informant Farid Ahmed S/O Mohd. Hussain R/O Budhan Tehsil Mahore appeared before Abdul Majid- ASI of Police Station Gool, who was camping at Budhan, and gave verbal information that on 20.9.2005 at 11 a.m., while he was proceeding from his Gharat (water-mill) to his home, he noticed the accused quarrelling with Mst Rakhela Akhter W/O Mohd Mansha, beating her and dragging her inside the house. The informant claimed that when he rushed there, he found the door of the house latched. Upon unlatching of the door, he found Mst Rakhela Akhter lying dead. She had sustained injury on the back side of her head, which was bleeding. A blood-stained axe was lying near her body. The accused had escaped from the spot. He claimed that Muneer Hussein S/o Fateh Mohd and Jamal Din S/o Ali, who were called by him on spot, too had seen the occurrence. Husband of the deceased was out of station and there was no adult member of the family in the house. The information laid by informant Farid Ahmed was recorded by Abdul Majid, ASI and forwarded along with his docket to Police Station, Gool for registration of case. Based on the information emanating from informant Farid Ahmed, a case under FIR No.75/2005 for offence under section 302 RPC was registered at Police Station, Gool. ASI, Abdul Majid took up the investigation in hand. He seized the axe and the soil-both bloodstained and sealed the same. He also seized the dead body of Mst Rakhela Akhter and arranged its post-mortem examination. The body of the deceased was later delivered to the family for last rites. He recorded the statements of witnesses and arrested the accused. The investigation disclosed that the accused was inimical towards his brother Mohd. Mansha on account of dispute relating to land. The accused had temporarily migrated to Dharmari. On 20.9.2005 when Mohd Mansha had gone to Thuru, the accused arrived in the house of Mohd Mansha, beat up Mst Rakhela Akhter and after dragging her inside struck her head with an axe resulting in her death. The accused closed and latched the door of the house and made good his escape. The investigation culminated in filing of charge-sheet against the accused for offence under section 302 RPC.
3. The case landed in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge Reasi in pursuance of the committal proceedings conducted by learned Judicial Magistrate, Gool. The charges were framed against the accused for offence under section 302 RPC, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. prosecution adduced evidence at the trial, brief resume whereof is summarized as follows:-
Prosecution Evidence
4. PW Mohd. Mansha is the husband of deceased. He deposed that his father had partitioned the land between him and the accused, who is his brother. He alleged that it was three days prior to the occurrence, the accused had threatened to eliminate him or his wife unless the witness abandoned his land. The witness claimed that he did not succumb to the threat of accused. On Tuesday, while he was going to fetch food grains, the accused came across him at Payan. However, they did not engage in conversation. When he reached near Payan School after collecting food grains, he was told by Mushtaq Ahmed S/O Muneer Hussain that the accused had killed his (witness- s) wife. He rushed to his house, where he found his wife lying dead. The