Virender Singh
Rajni Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. Pursuant to notice, Mrs. Neeru Goswami, learned Dy. Advocate General, had put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6, whereas Mr. K. M. Bhatti, Advocate, had put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.7. Since on one date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the instant petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. However, thereafter it was restored and all the respondents were put to fresh notices. Vide my separate Zimini (short) o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.