SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(J&K) 604

Virender Singh
Rajni Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Surinder Singh, Neeru Goswami.

1. Through the medium of instant petition, the petitioner seeks quashment of order No.ZEO/S/RT/1181-82 dated 23.01.2004 (Annexure-C) issued by Zonal Education Officer, Satwari (respondent No.5) vide which Parvinder Kour (respondent No.7) has been engaged as Rehbar-e-Taleem (hereinafter for short referred to as `R-e-T’) Teacher in Government Primary School Haripur, primarily on the ground that she figures at serial No.1 in the merit list (Annexure-A) prepared by respondent No.5, whereas private respondent No.7 at serial No.2 and that her name was also approved by the Village Level Education Committee (VLEC), but she has been ignored for appointment and instead respondent No.7 was appointed, who was less meritorious.

2. Pursuant to notice, Mrs. Neeru Goswami, learned Dy. Advocate General, had put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6, whereas Mr. K. M. Bhatti, Advocate, had put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.7. Since on one date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the instant petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. However, thereafter it was restored and all the respondents were put to fresh notices. Vide my separate Zimini (short) o



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top