Tashi Rabstan, J.:-

1. The petitioner earlier approached this Court through the medium of writ petition (SWP No. 2085/2002) seeking his regularization in terms of SRO 64 of 1994 on the ground that he had been in service of respondents as daily rated worker since 07.03.1994, as such, was entitled to be regularized on completion of continued service of seven years. SWP No. 2085/2002 (earlier writ petition) came to be disposed of by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2012 in which direction was issued to the respondents to accord consideration to the petitioner's regularization having regard to the mandate of SRO 64 of 1994. Pursuant to the aforesaid order of this Court, the matter was considered by respondent No. 2 who vide communication dated 30.04.2012 rejected the case of the petitioner for regularization under SRO 64 of 1994. It is this order, which is impugned in the present writ petition.

2. The order impugned has been assailed by the petitioner primarily on the following grounds:-

(a) That the petitioner was engaged as daily rated worker in March, 1994 prior to the cut of date, i.e. 01.04.1994 mentioned in SRO 64 of 1994, as such, on completion of 7 years continued serv