SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(J&K) 15

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR
Vinod Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Sharief – Respondent


ORDER :

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 for reference of the disputes mentioned in the petition for arbitration to an independent arbitrator.

2. It is averred that the petitioner was incorporated as a partner along with the respondent in the business of selling of LPG Gas and the partnership deed executed between them, which was registered before the learned Sub- Registrar, 2nd Additional Munsiff, Jammu on 26-4-2011.

3. It is further averred by the petitioner that he had invested a capital of Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lacs) in the partnership business with the understanding that the profits would be shared in equal proportion by both the partners but subsequently it is averred that the respondent went back on his promise and stopped sharing the profits of the business and also filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the petitioner from interfering into the business of Gas Agency, which is run in the name and style of M/s. Shaheed Mohd. Fareed Gas Agency, Nowshera).

4. Further it is averred that the disputes have arisen between the parties, which are























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top