SANJEEV KUMAR
Anil Suri – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
1. The petitioners in all these four petitions are employees either of the Government Department or Autonomous Institutions like J&K Khadi and Village Industries Board, Jammu and have been stated to be serving in the Transport Department on deputation after having been transferred/deputed by their parent departments. Having served in the department of Transport for years together, the petitioners claim that they have acquired an indefeasible right of being permanently absorbed in the Transport department and, therefore, cannot be repatriated to their parent departments. Since the grievance projected and the relief claimed in all these petitions are almost identical and have, therefore, been heard together and taken up for decision by a common judgment.
SWP No. 115/2006:
2. This petition has been filed by the two petitioners. The petitioner No. 1, a Junior Assistant in the Social Welfare Department of the State, was transferred to the office of Transport Commissioner, Jammu against the available vacancy vide Government Order No. 1564-GAD of 1997 dated 29.09.1997. The petitioner No. 2, a Supervisor of J&K Khadi and Village Industries Board, Jammu, was also similarly transferr
Ashok Kumar Uppal v. State of J&K and ors.
C.B.Gautam v. Union of India and ors.
Calcutta Gujarati Education Society and anr. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corpn. and others
Kunal Nanda v. Union of India and another
Manzoor Hussain Gulshan v. State of J&K
Motiram Ghelabhai (Dead) through LR Maniram Motiram v. Jagan Nagar(dead) through LRs and ors.
Narender Chadha v. Union of India and ors.
Shreya Singhal. V. Union of India
UP State Electricity Board and ors. v. Hari Shanker Jain and ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.