ALOK ARADHE
Gajinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Alok Aradhe, J.
1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the notification dated 22.10.2011 issued under Section 4 of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The petitioners also seek a writ of mandamus to the respondents to treat the petitioners at par with the adjoining occupants in possession of the lands whose land has been de-notified from acquisition. In order to appreciate the petitioners' challenge to the impugned proceedings, few facts need mention which are stated infra. An indent was placed by the Irrigation and Flood Control Department for acquisition of land admeasuring 123 kanals situate at Rakh-Raipur, Tehsil and District Jammu for detouring of canals due to expansion of Jammu Airport. A notification was published under Section 4(1) dated 21.10.2011 in the daily newspapers on 23.10.2011 by which the objections were invited, however, no objections were received. Thereupon, a notification under Sections 6 and 7 of the Act was issued on 08.11.2012 and subsequently, a notification under Section 9 and 9-A of the Act was issued on 18.12.2012 and an award was passed on 24.07.2014. Thereafter the wr
Ali Mohd. Najar & Ors. vs. State & Ors.
Bansi Lal Bhat vs. State of J & K & Ors.
Balkrishan Dutta v. State of J&K
May George v. Special Tehsildar and Ors.
M/s. V.K.M. Kattha Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and others
Patasi Devi vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Raghbir Singh Sehrawat Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Swaran Lata v. State of Haryana
Special Deputy Controller, Land Acquisition, CMDA v. J. Sivaprakasam and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.