SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 170

M.K.HANJURA
Mirza Habib ul Hassan Beigh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.A. Jan, Amani
For the Respondents: Nazir Ahmad Bhat

ORDER :

M.K. Hanjura, J.

1. Petitioner claims that he possesses the Passport with the date of expiry as 29.06.2016. He sought issuance of the full-term Passport in place of one year. However, the respondents have not come to terms to issue the full term Passport as by the communication bearing No. POSK/P-III/24-16/4966 dated 17th June 2016, they declined to accede to his request. This, according to the petitioner, has forced him to knock at the portals of this Court with the writ petition on hand.

2. The case set up by the petitioner is that during the course of the trial, faced by him, in the case FIR No. 14/1991, in the court of the learned Special Judge, Anticorruption, Srinagar, validity of the passport/travel document expired on or around in the month of December, 2004. The petitioner, accordingly, applied for renewal of the passport/travel document. The petitioner also states that the prosecution, being faced by him in case FIR No. 14/1991 is for the alleged acts done in discharge of the official duties, therefore, by reason and by virtue of the Standing Orders issued and notified vide GSR No. 570 (E) dated 25.08.1993, the applicability of Clause (f) of Subsection 2 of Section 6






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top