SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(J&K) 446

B.S.WALIA
Janki Nath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sudershan Sharma.
For the Respondent: W.S. Nargal.

JUDGMENT :

B.S. Walia, J.

1. Prayer is for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing Order No. 756 of 2010, dated 09.09.2010, Mandamus for directing the respondents to allow the petitioners to resume duty forthwith as also to release their salary, past and future as also to initiate a probe into the conduct of respondent No. 4 for non-compliance with the directions of this Court as also for harassing the petitioners. That as per averments in the writ petition, the petitioners as ex servicemen came to be recruited as constable's in the Police Department during the peak of militancy. Subsequently their status was changed and instead of the salary attached to the post of constable, they were paid consolidated salary of Rs. 1500/- per month which was enhanced from time to time and at the time of filing of the writ petition, they were being paid salary of Rs. 3000/- per month. It is also averred that the duty of the petitioners is the same as that of Constables in the police department.

2. Aggrieved against the change of status in service, the petitioners filed a writ petition before this Court, but this Court did not decide the status of the petitioners which compelled them to inv





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top