SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 270

M.K.HANJURA
Abdul Rehman Mir – Appellant
Versus
State of JK – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Salih Pirzada, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. M. I. Dar, AAG.

JUDGMENT :

1. The fascicule of the facts, necessitous and germane to comprehend the backdrop of the present writ petition, based whereupon a case has been set in motion and the present legal process built, has its genesis and origin to the envisioning of the claim of the petitioner as treating him a fresh appointee by the Government Order no.133-H&ME of 2003 dated 20th February 2003, has put him in uncertainty and melancholy. It is this order of which petitioner is aggrieved and throws challenge thereto on grounds exhorted in writ petition on hand.

2. The petitioner pleads that he, amongst others, came to be appointed as an Assistant Surgeon by the Government Order no.667-HME of 1989 dated 29th August 1989. He figures at serial no.55 in the aforesaid Government order. He was adjusted at District Udhampur. He thereafter applied for undergoing the Junior Residency at Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Soura. The permission therefor was vouchsafed. He successfully underwent and completed his Junior Residency. The petitioner was selected for undergoing the Post Grad






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top