SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 538

SANJEEV KUMAR
Rajesh Madanlal Anand – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Madanlal Anand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajnesh Oswal

JUDGMENT :

1. This petition purportedly filed under Section 104 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir is directed against the order dated 12.07.2018 passed by the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Jammu (hereinafter referred to as the trial Court) in File No. 23/Civil titled Rajesh Madanlal Anand v. Rakesh Madanlal Anand and another whereby the trial Court has refused to entertain the suit filed by the petitioner under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) and has treated the same as a regular suit.

2. At the outset, it may be noted that this Petition has been filed by the petitioner purportedly under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, but the same has been numbered by the Registry as Civil Revision. Admittedly, the order impugned does not determine the rights of the parties finally. By virtue of the order impugned, the trial Court has simply refused to entertain the suit under Order 37 of CPC and has treated the same as a regular suit. The rights of the parties are, therefore, yet to be determined in the suit which would be tried as a regular suit in view of the order of the trial Court impugned in this petition. In that view of


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top