SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 869

ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
Mushtaq Ahmad Dar – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. M. A. Qayoom, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner/respondent in CIA No. 108/2016, through the medium of the instant review petition, seeks review of final judgment of this Court dated 8th of November, 2017, passed in CIA No. 108/2016, operative portion whereof reads as under:

“In the result, the appeal is allowed, the impugned Judgment and decree is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Civil Court for deciding the civil suit of respondent-plaintiff afresh in accordance with law. Parties shall appear before the Court below on 13.11.2017. Any amount deposited on account of Judgment and decree passed by the civil Court before this Court or civil Court shall stand released in favour of the appellants.”

2. Mr. Qayoom, the learned counsel for the review petitioner/respondent in the appeal, submits that the appeal filed by the appellants/respondents herein was not maintainable in view of the fact that the appellants had challenged the judgment and decree as well as the order passed in execution petition by medium of an appeal. In that backdrop, the learned counsel contends that the Court has, thus, passed the impugned judgment in an appeal which was, in fact, no appeal in the eyes of law. The learned








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top