SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 973

ALI MOHD.MAGREY
Mir Engineers & Builders – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Diesels – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :B.A. Bashir, Farah Bashir, Advocate
For the Respondents:Shahbaz Sikander Mir, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Ali Mohd. Magrey, J.

1. The petitioner, through the medium of instant review petition, seeks review of final judgment of this Court dated 13th of March, 2015, passed in 561-A No. 146/2012; Cr. MP No. 306/2012, in terms whereof, it was observed as under:

"For the aforesaid reasons, this petition is dismissed alongwith connected miscellaneous petition. Interim direction, if any, subsists shall stand vacated.

As mentioned earlier, the complaint in question has been filed 29.04.2008. Since then almost six years have passed by now, unfortunately, the complaint continues to be at its initial stage. One is anguished to notice the state of affairs, which, of course, is not attributable to the trial Court. The fault lies elsewhere. Therefore, it is a fit case where it needs to be mentioned in clear terms that let the delaying tactics be given a quietus and let the trial start so that the case is brought to its logical end.

The Registry is directed to send down the trial court records forthwith through whatever speedy mode he may think fit.

The petitioner-accused is directed to present himself before the trial court on 23.03.2015. The trial court shall complete the process in terms of S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top