TASHI RABSTAN
Showkat Ahmad Mir – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
Tashi Rabstan, J.
1. Petitioner vide Order No. 1(1)/Spl/2005/4598 dated 1st February 2012, issued by Prasar Bharati Broadcasting Corporation of India, Doordarshan Kendra, Srinagar, was appointed on a temporary post of Tailor, reserved for OBC Category candidate under Direct Recruitment Quota. However, by order No. 21 (Misc.) 10-S(TV)/2144 dated 10th September 2013, petitioner's services have been terminated with immediate effect. It is this order, of which petitioner is aggrieved and seeks following relief:
(a) Writ of certiorari, quashing impugned order No. 21 (Misc.) 10-S(TV)/2144 dated 10.9.2013;
(b) Writ of mandamus, commanding respondents to reinstate petitioner to his original post and release all consequential relief.
2. Respondents 1 to 3, in their Reply, insist that petitioner has committed serious misconduct by producing fraudulent certificate along with his application and is not entitled to claim any right of hearing because of fraud committed by him and as a sequel thereto a genuine candidate could not be selected and appointed. Petitioner at the time of appointment was overage and by submitting fake and fraudulent certificate qua date of birth got appointed and aft
A.V. Papayya Sastry and others v. Government of A.P. and others
Ganpatbhai Mahijibhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Lazarus Estates Ltd. v. Beasley (1956) 1 All ER 341: (1956) 1 QB 702 : (1956) 2 WLR 502 (CA)
Mubarak Ahmad Bhat v. State & others
Mohammad Maqbool Wagay v. State of J & K & others
R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala
Rita Mishra v. Director Primary Education Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.