ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
Mukhtar Ahmad Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ali Mohammad Magrey, J.
By medium of this review petition, the petitioner seeks review of final judgment of this Court dated 21st of October, 2019, passed in WP(C) No. 3036/2019, whereby the petition of the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. Mr Ratanpuri, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has filed the instant review petition against the judgment aforesaid on the ground that in the aforesaid judgment, this Court in Paragraph No. 02 on Page No. 2, has observed that the inquiry is pending against the petitioner, when fact of the matter is that enquiry, has since been concluded and the committee has submitted its report as well.
4. Heard Mr Ratanpuri, the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the pleadings on record and considered the matter.
5. What requires to be stated, at the outset, is that in the instant review petition, the review petitioner has touched the merits of the case, which, in a review petition, is unwarranted as per well settled position of law. The grounds urged in the review petition have already been decided and findings returned thereon by the Court and, if the petitioner was aggrieved of the said findings, he ought to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.