SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 85

ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
Sumit Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Vice Chancellor – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Wani Manzoor.
For the Respondent: Mr. T.H. Khawja.

JUDGMENT :

ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY, J.

1. In all these Writ Petitions, the Petitioners are seeking a direction in the name of the Respondent-University to confirm their admission for B. Ed. Course Session 2018-20; accept entertain their RRs. register them along with the Batch of 2018-20 for B. Ed. Course; and also allow them to appear in the examination of Batch 2018-20 along with other candidates. Thus, common questions of facts and the law are involved in this batch of Writ Petitions, therefore, I propose to decide the same by virtue of this common judgment.

2. The case of the Petitioners is that pursuant to admission notification issued by the Respondent-University in the year 2018, they, in view of the situation as was prevailing in the then State of J&K (now Union Territory), could not apply in time and, subsequently, having requested the private B. Ed. Colleges for seeking admission in B. Ed. Course for the session 2018-20. It is stated that the Respondent-University, however, did not regularize confirm the admission of the Petitioners, despite repeated requests representations made in this behalf, constraining the Petitioners to approach this Court through the medium of Writ Petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top