SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 153

SANJEEV KUMAR
Fayaz Ahmed Lone – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearing Counsel:
For the Petitioner(s):Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG

Judgment

Sanjeev Kumar, J.—This petition under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. is directed against order dated 30.08.1999 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar [“the Trial Court”] in criminal challan titled State v. Mushtaq Ahmad Ganie and others, arising out of FIR No.11/1996 of Police Station, Pulwama.

2. In terms of the order impugned, the Trial Court has arraigned the petitioner along with seven other persons as accused in the challan, on the basis of statements of the prosecution witnesses recorded during trial. The case set up by the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named by the police in the FIR nor was his involvement found during the course of investigation. It is submitted that in the challan presented before the Trial Court, the police did not arraign the petitioner as accused and rightly so, as neither the petitioner was named in the FIR nor he was named by any of the prosecution witnesses, whose statements were recorded by the police during investigation. It is, thus, argued that in the absence of specific role ascribed to the petitioner in the commission of the offence alleged in the challan, the petitioner could not have been arraigned as an acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top