VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
Yousuf – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 15.12.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udhampur [hereinafter referred to as “the Trial Court”] in Challan titled State v. Begum, arising out of FIR No.60/2014, whereby respondent No.2, a juvenile, has been exonerated from the enquiry and absolved from the person and surety bonds, on the following grounds:
ii) The Trial Court after noticing various defects in the investigation conducted by the police, should have directed further investigation in the matter instead of exonerating respondent No.2.
iii) The investigation in the case has been conducted in a biased manner because despite informing the Investigating Officer that son of the petitioner has been murdered by Irshad Ali, Sher Ali, Bahadar, Miyon and others, they were not apprehended by the police.
2) Briefly stated, the facts leading to the filing of this revision petition are that on 05.07.2014, Police of Police Post Ghordi came to know from reliable sources that a dead body was lying in the thoroughfar
Akalu Ahir v. Ramdeo Ram [(1973) 2 SCC 583 : 1973 SCC (Cri) 903]
D. Stephens v. Nosibolla [AIR 1951 SC 196 : 1951 SCR 284]
K. Chinnaswamy Reddy v. State of A.P. [AIR 1962 SC 1788 : (1963) 3 SCR 412]
Logendranath Jha v. Polai Lal Biswas [AIR 1951 SC 316 : 1951 SCR 676]
Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Sarju Singh [AIR 1968 SC 707 : (1968) 2 SCR 287]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.