SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 408

PANKAJ MITHAL, RAJNESH OSWAL
State of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Meet Masih – Respondent


Per Rajnesh Oswal J.

1. This instant criminal acquittal appeal has been preferred by the State/U.T of J&K-appellant against the judgment dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu (hereinafter to be referred as the trial court) by virtue of which, the respondent has been acquitted of the charges under sections 363 and 376 RPC arising out of FIR bearing No. 156/2010 of Police Station, Satwari, District Jammu.

2. The instant appeal has been filed on the grounds that there is sufficient material on record to convict the respondent and the prosecution has established the case against the respondent by adducing documentary as well as oral evidence, that is sufficient to prove the guilt of the respondent. It is further stated that the learned trial court has taken hyper technical approach while considering the date of birth of the appellant, as such, the judgment impugned is bad in the eye of law.

3. The brief facts those are necessary of the disposal of the present appeal are that on 18.09.2010, a written report lodged by Janak Raj, the father of the minor prosecutrix at Police Station Satwari that that his daughter, student of 8th Class, aged 15 years went

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top