SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 494

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Pankaj Mithal, Mohd. Akram Chowdhary, JJ.
Abdul Rahman Sofi - Petitioner
Versus
State of J&K and Ors. -Respondents
OWP No.1696/2017
Decided On : 01-12-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mohammad Iqbal Jan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. B.A. Dar, Sr. AAG and Mr. M.A. Chashoo, AAG.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 4-Acquisition of land-Exchange deed is existing since 1987 and so are mutation entries made on its basis but respondents never took any step to dispute or challenge exchange deed or even attestation entries except for taking objection in this regard in this second round of litigation between the parties-Petitioner is entitled to compensation for at least 10 Marlas of his land which was given to his predecessor in interest in exchange-Answering respondents cannot at this stage be permitted to take a summersault and to dispute exchange deed-Issue whether land was rightly offered in lieu of proprietary land of petitioner pails into insignificance once in previous round of litigation State authorities have admitted that land had vested in ownership of predecessor in interest of petitioner by virtue of mutation attested on the basis of exchange deed without disputing correctness and validity of exchange deed-Petitioner has been deprived not only of land received in exchange but of his original land as well-In view of such deprivation from land, petitioner is entitled to be compensated as right to property is a constitutional right which has been recognized akin to a fundamental right and more importantly as a basic human right-Compensation for land is payable by State authorities and it is immaterial as to which department ultimately has to bear burden-Chief Secretary directed to get compensation of land duly assessed by Collector Land Acquisition/ Assistant Commissioner Revenue, Kulgam, within a period of two months from the date a copy of this order is produced before him and to ensure its payment within a period of one month thereafter-In the event petitioner is not satisfied by compensation so assessed, it will be open for him to withdraw it under protest and to seek reference before Civil/District Court. (Paras 16, 20, 23, 25, 26 and 27)

Result-Writ Petition allowed.

ORDER :

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner was the proprietor in possession of the land measuring 13 marlas, 10 marlas covered by survey no.656 and 3 marlas by survey no.717, situate at Khudwani Tehsil Kulgam. In terms of the registered exchange deed dated 08.12.1987, he was given ownership rights as also possession of equivalent land measuring 13 marlas of survey no.1236/670 situate at Khudwani Tehsil and District Kulgam in lieu of his above referred proprietary land. The said transfer was duly attested vide mutation no.718 on the basis of the aforesaid registered exchange deed.

3. Sometime in the year 2006, the said 13 marlas of land given in ownership and possession of predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner of survey no.1236/670 was brought within the alignment for road widening and its possession was taken over without formally acquiring it and paying any compensation to the petitioner.

4. The petitioner, as such, filed OWP No.1285/2012 and his brother writ petition OWP No.1505/2011 seeking direction for payment of compensation for the aforesaid land. In response to the said writ petition reply was filed by the State respondents i.e. the State of Jammu & Kashmir through Revenue Department, the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir at Srinagar and the Deputy Commissioner, Kulgam, stating that the said land vested with predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner by virtue of mutation no.718 attested pursuant to the execution of the deed of exchange between the officials of the Irrigation Department and the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner. The said land, 10 marlas only, is falling within the alignment of the road and since it is the proprietary land of the petitioner, he is entitled to compensation under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act for which process would be initiated shortly.

5. The aforesaid writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 26.08.2013 noting that the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Kulgam, and the Tehsildar, Kulgam, who were directed to appear in person before the court have stated that 10 marlas of land aforesaid is in possession of the Irrigation Department and for the remaining 3 marlas of land of the petitioner, request has been made to the revenue authorities to locate and identify the same. A further direction was issued to the official respondents to take recourse to the land acquisition proceedings in accordance with law to formally acquire the land of the petitioner for road widening.

6. It is in the above background that the petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming compensation of the aforesaid 13 marlas of land which has still not been paid to him and has not been formally acquired though it remains to be in possession of the State authorities i.e., the Irrigation Department/ PWD(R&B) Department.

7. The respondents through the Executive Engineer, PWD(R&B), have filed objections to the writ petition wherein in paragraph 5, it has been submitted that the Tehsildar, Kulgam, reported to the Assistant Commissioner Revenue on 15.10.2012 that the land of the petitioner coming in the alignment of the road was originally the State land which was given to the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner by virtue of a registered exchange deed dated 08.12.1987 and that the said land stands mutated in his name vide mutation no.718. It is also stated therein that the Executive Engineer, R&B Division, Kulgam, has framed intent and other related documents for acquiring the land coming under the alignment of the said road which stands submitted to the Superintending Engineer, R&B Circle, Anantnag, vide letter dated 06.10.2017 for taking further action and for making arrangement of tentative funds of Rs. 05 lakhs. The said intent has been forwarded to the Chief Engineer R&B Circle, on 16.10.2017.

8. The objections aforesaid are completely silent as to whether subsequently, the land has been notified to be acquired or not and w

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top