IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Sindhu Sharma, J.
Vinkle Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of J&K and Ors. - Respondents
OWP No.519/2018, IA No.01/2018, IA No.02/2018
Decided On : 27-05-2022
National Food Security Act, 2013-Government Accommodation-National Food Security Act, 2013 has been enacted for providing food nutritional security by ensuring access of adequate quantities of quality food at affordable prices-It is convenience of public who is to receive ration which is to be seen, more so when topography of area is hilly-Petitioner is unable to show how he is entitled for any particular number of Ration Tickets as there is no assurance extended by respondents that ration tickets will not be decreased, reduced or varied-Respondents in order to provide ration under public distribution at door-step have with a view to implement National Food Security Act, 2013 to provide quality and quantity of food grains to targeted population, opened Fair Price Shop at Village Dharafra-Government has to provide scheme of fair distribution of food grains at the doorstep delivery, which they have done-Respondents have in order to serve interest of rationees of Village Dharafra after considering their application have opened a Fair Price Shop in Village Dharafra and since petitioner's Fair Price Shop is at Village Dugli-B, he cannot be aggrieved of same, more so when he himself admitted that Ration Tickets of Village Dharafra attached to Dugli-B-Inhabitants of village Dharafra are entitled to ration delivery at doorstep in terms of Govt. Order No. 127-FCS& CA of 2016 dated 04.08.2016-Petition dismissed. (Paras 16, 17, 18 and 19)
Result-Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Sindhu Sharma, J.
The petitioner was issued Fair Price Shop licence for opening the same in Village Dugli-B, Tehsil Bhalla, District Doda vide Government Order No. 50-FCS&CA of 2018 dated 20.02.2018. This Government order also directed detachment of 250 ration tickets from the existing sale center at Dugli. On 08.03.2018, the respondent No. 1 vide Government Order No. 64-FCS&CA of 2018 issued Fair Price Shop license in favour of Arvind Kumar-respondent No. 5 for location Dharafra Tehsil Bhalla District Doda and it also directed detachment of 227 families from the existing Fair Price Shop and the same were attached with him.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that after issuance of the Government Order No. 50-FCS&CA of 2018 dated 20.02.2018 in favour of respondent No. 5, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are misreading and misinterpreting the said order and applying the same to the rationees attached with the Fair Price Shop of the petitioner. This would mean that the rationees attached to Fair Price Shop operated by the petitioner would decrease considerably from the norm fixed i.e. 250 rationees for every Fair Price Shop.
3. The existing Fair Price Shop at Village Dugli according to the petitioner is catering to the rationees not only from village Dugli but also of villages of Dharafra and Chilly. In fact, the Tehsil Supply Officer, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Doda had recommended the case of the petitioner for issuance of Fair Price Shop at Village Dugli-B as in Village Dugli, a Fair Price Shop was already existing, therefore, two Fair Price Shops were sanctioned, one at Dugli and another at Dulgi-B, having a distance of more than 2 Kms.
4. Keeping in view the new location of Fair Price Shop center Dugli-B, the rationees of village Dharafra were amongst the 227 rationees attached to the petitioner’s Fair Price Shop at Dugli-B. The petitioner submits that there were 588 families which were attached with the original Fair Price Shop in Village Dugli, 250 families from the same were detached and allotted to the petitioner leaving behind only 338 families with the existing dealer at Dugli.
5. The respondents, in terms of Government Order No. 64-FCS&CA of 2018 dated 08.03.2018 have ordered detachment of 227 families from the existing Fair Price Shop. These 588 families were entitled for ration from the Fair Price Shop catering to Village Dugli, Dharafra and Chilly and out of these 588 families, petitioner has been allotted 250 families, whereas, existing Fair Price Shop at Dugli was catering to the rest of 388 families, thus, detachment of 227 families from the existing Fair Price Shop dealer would result more families being detached from the Fair Price Shop operated by him which is against the policy framed by the Government i.e. minimum 250 rationees for every Fair Price Shop. The Government Order No. 127-FCS&CA of 2016 dated 04.08.2016 which stipulates that new Fair Price Shop is to be opened only for 250 ration tickets. The Tehsil Supply Officer of Bhala vide his communication dated 03.05.2017 has also clarified this fact.
6. The petitioner is, thus, aggrieved of Government Order No. 64-FCS&CA of 2018 dated 08.03.2018 granting sanction to respondent No. 5 for opening of Fair Price Shop at Village Dharafra, Tehsil Bhala, District Doda as the same is contrary to the policy framed by the respondent for allotment of Fair Price Shop. The opening of Fair Price Shop, as per the petitioner, in the absence of the rationees to whom it has to cater is bad and, as such, same is required to be set aside. The order of detaching the rationees from the existing Fair Price Shop of the petitioner will leave only 88 families and this will not only be against policy but also affect him harshly. The petitioner, thus, seeks quashing of Government Order No. 64-FCS&CA of 2018 dated 08.03.2018 whereby license for Fair Price Shop has been issued in favour of the respondent No. 5 for location at Dharafra and also a dire
SupremeToday
The court upheld the policy allowing a new Fair Price Shop due to population growth, affirming that the petitioner could retain only 250 rationees as per guidelines.
The establishment of fair price shops is a policy decision by the State, and existing shop holders have no legal rights to oppose new shops based on prior guidelines.
The establishment of fair price shops is a policy decision of the State Government; guidelines are not legally binding rights. Existing license holders cannot claim exclusive operation rights in over....
The court stressed the necessity of transparent and fair processes for licensing Fair Price Shops, affirming that government actions must comply with constitutional principles of equality.
Authorised authorities may sanction additional fair price shops to improve service for cardholders, provided the minimum card threshold of 500 for rural and 800 for urban areas is maintained for exis....
The bifurcation of a fair price shop may be upheld if it is done in accordance with the norms prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.35, dated 17.09.2007, considering the convenience of the cardholders and the econ....
A person must demonstrate a legal grievance to maintain a writ petition; mere disappointment does not confer locus standi.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.