In The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
Javeed Ahmad Bhat and Another – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K and Others – Respondent
WP(C) No.370/2022, CM No.933/2022 c/w WP(C) No.371/2022, CM No.934/2022, WP(C) No.372/2022, CM No.935/2022
Decided on 18.7.2022
J&K Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 – Rules 17(b) – Article 37 of CSR Vol. 1 – Engagement of petitioners as Rehbar-e-Taleems in Middle School, terminated – Minimum and maximum age limit prescribed for recruitment must be possessed by candidates seeking direct recruitment to service with reference to 1st day of January of year in which competitive examination is held or nomination is made in respect of vacancy to which recruitment is made – Even if statutory rules do not provide for giving an opportunity of being heard to a person before taking adverse action against him, yet it is duty of authority concerned to give opportunity of being heard to person before passing order which has effect of depriving him of his vital civil rights – Impugned order has not only deprived them of their right of regularization as general line teacher, but it has even taken away their engagement as ReTs and has effect of depriving them of their right to livelihood – Respondents directed to consider cases of petitioners and pass appropriate order of relaxation of minimum age in their favour – Petitions allowed. (Paras 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 23, 24 and 25)
Judgment :
In these three writ petitions clubbed together, the petitioners are aggrieved of and have challenged Government Order No.78-Edu of 2022 dated 21.02.2022 [“the impugned order’] whereby the engagement of the petitioners as Rehbar-e-Taleems [“ReTs’] in Middle School, G.B. Langkhul Kachard Nadimarg, Kulgam, Middle School, Nagbal, Anantnag and UPS Adoora Shopian, respectively has been terminated with immediate effect. The impugned order is challenged by the petitioners in their respective petitions on variety of grounds. However, before adverting to the grounds of challenge pleaded and urged by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, it is necessary to set out brief background, leading to the issuance of impugned order of termination of engagement of the petitioners.
2. ReT Scheme for providing teaching guides in the Schools facing deficiency of teaching staff was launched nationwide somewhere in the year 2000. The then Government of Jammu and Kashmir, vide Government Order No.396-Edu of 2000 dated 28.04.2000, issued detailed guidelines for engagement of teaching guides to be known as ReTs in different Schools of the then State. The selection process to supply the identified vacancies of ReTs was set in motion in different education zones of the State. As a sequel to this effort of the Government, ZEO, D.H.Pora issued an Advertisement Notification on 28.12.2011 inviting applications from the candidates hailing from the revenue village concerned for filling up of two posts of ReTs in the Primary School Gojer Basti Lungkhull Kachad Nandimarg and the last date for submission of application forms was 10 days from the publication of the said notification. The petitioner Javeed Ahmad Bhat participated in the selection process along with other eligible candidates. He, in view of his merit, was selected and engaged as ReT in the aforesaid School under SSA 2011-12 in terms of Order No. CEO/K/Ret/1983-84/12 dated 03.05.2012 issued by the Chief Education Officer Kulgam. Similarly, the petitioner Sajad Hussian Shah was selected and engaged as ReT in Middle School, Nagbal in terms of order No. ZEO/A/847/12 dated 26.11.2012 issued by the ZEO, Aishmuqam. The engagement of the petitioner Sajad Hussian Shah was made pursuant to the selection process conducted in terms of Advertisement Notification dated 12.06.2008 issued by the ZEO Aishmuqam, Anantnag. Likewise, the petitioner Shabeer Ahmed Malla came to be engaged as ReT in UPS Adoora, Shopian by the order of ZEO, Keegam issued vide his No.ZEO/Keegam/RET/476-79 dated 28.05.2012. The engagement of the petitioner Shabeer Ahmad Malla was in reference to the selection process conducted pursuant to an Advertisement Notification issued by the ZEO, Keegam on 30.12.2008.
3. All the petitioners joined their respective Schools and performed their duties as ReTs for more than five years continuously and to the best satisfaction of the respondents. As is provided under the ReT Scheme promulgated by the Government vide Government order dated 28.04.2000 (supra), all the three petitioners became entitled to regularization as General Line Teaches. Accordingly, their cases were forwarded to the Government for consideration and issuance of appropriate orders of regularization as General Line Teachers in their favour.
4. It appears that the Administrative Department of School Education, while scrutinizing the cases of the petitioners for regularization as General Line Teachers, found that the age of the petitioner Javeed Ahmed Bhat on 1st of January of the calendar year in which the Advertisement notice was issued for engagement of ReT in the School concerned, was 17 years, 09 months and 21 days and the age of the petitioner Sajad Hussain Shah was 17 years, 10 months and 21 days on 1st of January of the calendar year in which the Advertisement notice for engagement of ReT in Middle School Nagbal Anantnag was issued. Likewise, in the case of the petitioner Shabeer Ahmed Malla, the Administrative Departm
: Termination from service – Respondents directed to consider cases of petitioners and pass appropriate order of relaxation of minimum age in their favour.
Age for ReT regularization reckoned at ReT appointment; long service waives objection; discriminatory denial violates Art.14.
Pre-regularization service under scheme cannot count for cadre seniority; executive orders cannot override statutory recruitment rules.
(1) Appointments to public posts should be strictly in accordance with Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India.(2) Construing provision relating to upper age limit as directory would be conferrin....
Qualifications for public employment must be valid as of the cut-off date, and long-term service can create an equity favoring regularization despite minor irregularities.
The court affirmed that eligibility for public employment requires meeting qualification criteria by the cut-off date, while also recognizing the principle of equity favoring long-serving employees i....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adherence to rules and regulations, the need for widespread publication of government decisions affecting government-aided sch....
The Executive cannot apply executive orders with retrospective effect to take away vested or accrued rights. The closure of the ReT Scheme was found to be in the public interest, and the impugned Gov....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.