IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Pankaj Mithal, Rajnesh Oswal, JJ.
Virender Pandoh – Petitioner
Versus
State of J&K & Ors. – Respondents
OWP No. 1329 of 2012
Decided On : 08-09-2021
Land Acquisition - Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, 1990 - Section 4, Section 6
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the acquisition of their land. The petitioner contended that the notifications issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, 1990 were not issued by the competent authority and that no satisfaction of the Government was recorded for acquiring the said land.
Finding of the Court:
The court examined the provisions of Section 4 and Section 6 of the Act to determine the essential requirements for publishing notifications and the competent authority empowered to issue them. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner had issued the declaration under Section 6 without the satisfaction of the State Government, rendering the declaration illegal, null, and void.
Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the notifications issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, 1990, and the authority empowered to make such declarations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the satisfaction of the Government is a crucial requirement for issuing a declaration under Section 6 of the Act, and the power to record satisfaction on behalf of the Government is not delegable to any officer. The court also emphasized that the satisfaction must be recorded by the Governor or the Cabinet, and the absence of such satisfaction renders the declaration illegal.
Final Decision: The court declared the notification issued by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 6 of the Act as illegal, null, and void, and allowed the writ petition.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sh. Rahul Bharti, senior counsel assisted by Ms. Zoya Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. D.C. Raina, Advocate General assisted by Sh. F.A. Natnoo, learned Additional Advocate General.
2. The petitioner through the medium of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of the mandamus commanding the respondents to produce the entire record of the acquisition of land in connection with the Award No. COL/ADC/Rsi/12/304, dated 06.08.2012 and to declare the said proceedings as null and void in respect of the petitioner's land measuring 22 kanals comprising Khasra No. 298 min and 299 min situate in Village Kotla Reasi.
3. The petitioner inter alia contends that the notifications issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') were not issued by the competent authority and that no satisfaction of the Government was recorded for acquiring the said land and as such, the entire proceedings stand vitiated in law.
4. The respondents have filed objections stating that the aforesaid land has been acquired on the indent for acquisition forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner, Reasi who is ex-officio Vice Chairman of Shiv Khori Shrine Board. On the said requisition, the Collector Land Acquisition (Additional Deputy Commissioner) Reasi issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Act on 22.01.2011. The interested persons were granted opportunity in terms of Section 5-A of the Act to file objections and a report was prepared by the Collector. The report was submitted to the Deputy Commissioner Reasi who in exercise of his power as per SRO 235 and 236 issued the declaration on 23.02.2011 under Section 6/7 of the Act. Thereafter final award was pronounced on 06- 08-2012. The acquisition proceedings were drawn in accordance with the statutory provisions by the competent authority and there is no illegality in acquiring the land.
5. To cut short the matter, let us examine the provisions of Section 4 and Section 6 of the Act so as to find out the essential requirement of law in publishing the said notifications and the competent authority that is empowered to issue and publish the said notification.
6. First we deal with the notification issued under Section 6 of the Act inasmuch as it is the final declaration to acquire the land whereas the notification under Section 4 of the Act is simply a proposal.
7. Section 6 of the Act reads as under:-
(1) When the Government is satisfied after considering the report, if any, made under section 5-A, sub-section (2), that any particular land is needed for public purpose, a declaration shall be made to that effect under the signature of the Revenue Minister or of some officer duly authorised in this behalf:
[Provided that no such declaration shall be made unless the compensation to be awarded for such property is to be paid wholly or partly out of the public revenues or some fund controlled or managed by a local authority.]
(2) The declaration shall be published in official Gazette, and shall state the district or other territorial division in which the land is situate, the purpose for which it is needed, its approximate areas and where a plan shall have been made of the land, the place where such plan may be inspected.
(3) The said declaration shall be conclusive evidence that land is needed for a public purpose, and after making such declaration the Government may acquire the land in manner hereinafter appearing.”
8. A plain and simple reading of sub-section (1) of Section 6 which is relevant for our purpose reveals that a declaration under Section 6 has to be made when the Government is satisfied that the land is needed for public purpose and such a declaration is to be made under the signature of the Revenue Minister or of some other Officer duly authorized in this behalf. In o
The court established that compliance with publication requirements and government satisfaction is essential for valid land acquisition under the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990.
Land acquisition – Notification - Merely because land owners had knowledge or failed to file objections would not make the notification valid if it is not published in the manner provided.
Mandatory compliance with notification procedures in land acquisition is essential; failure to do so invalidates the acquisition process.
If there is failure to publish notification in two daily newspapers, notification and consequential proceedings for acquiring land would stand vitiated for non-compliance of essential conditions of S....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict adherence to the prescribed timelines and procedures under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the consequences of non-compliance, leadi....
Acquisition of Land - Compensation - It is settled that the forum of writ petition is not as a matter of right or an appellate forum but is an extra ordinary remedy provided to check miscarriage of j....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was valid as the District Collector, acting within the authority delegated by ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.