RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Namburi Girijamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that they own respective extents of the subject property. The 2nd respondent issued Section 4(1) notification dated 02.11.2009 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which was published in Surya Daily Newspaper on 12.11.2009 in R.C.G.6/4838/2009 compri
Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of Bihar and others
Ashok Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Devender Kumar Tyagi v. State of U.P.
Gojer Brothers Private Limited and another vs. State of West Bengal and others
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn.Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai
Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal And Ors.
Khun Chand v. State of Rajasthan
Padma Sundara Rao (Dead) and others v. State of T.N. and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict adherence to the prescribed timelines and procedures under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the consequences of non-compliance, leadi....
Section 11A of Act, Collector has to make an award under Section 11 within a period of two years from date of publication of declaration and if no award is made within that period, entire proceedings....
The key legal principle established in the judgment is that the award must be made within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisi....
The court ruled that land acquisition proceedings lapsed as the award was not made within the two-year statutory period under Section 11A, affirming the necessity of all mandatory publication modes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.