SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 259

PUNEET GUPTA
Naresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ravi Abrol.
For the Respondent: Rupinder Singh.

JUDGMENT :

PUNEET GUPTA, J.

1. The appellant seeks enhancement of award, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udhampur, whereby the appellant has been awarded compensation to the tune of Rs. 7.57 lacs. It is suffice to mention that the insurer-respondent No. 3 has been held liable to pay compensation to the petitioner with the liberty to recover the same from the private respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 appeared through their counsel but did not appear later on and the case was heard in the absence of the said respondents.

3. The appellant submits that the Tribunal has not awarded the compensation as per the disability suffered by him. The appellant has submitted that the Tribunal has not otherwise awarded the compensation to the appellant keeping in view the facts that have come on record and also recorded by the Tribunal in its Award dated 26.12.2015. The learned counsel for the appellant has reiterated the submissions made in the appeal.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has submitted that the appellant has been awa

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top