IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
M.A. Chowdhary, J.
Mukesh Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
Bail App. No. 207 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2023
NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court directed the trial court to consider the petitioner's bail application, taking into account his HIV+ve status, and to decide the matter expeditiously.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, facing trial for possession of a commercial quantity of Poppy Straw under the NDPS Act, moved a bail application citing his HIV+ve status. The trial court had not addressed this ground in the initial application.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the trial court to consider the bail application, taking into account the petitioner's medical condition, and to decide the matter expeditiously within ten days.
Issues: The primary issue was the consideration of the petitioner's bail application in light of his HIV+ve status, which was not addressed by the trial court initially.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the trial court to consider the petitioner's medical condition in the bail application and to decide the matter expeditiously.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction to the trial court to consider the bail application, taking into account the petitioner's medical condition, and to decide the matter expeditiously within ten days.
JUDGMENT :
M.A. Chowdhary, J.
1. Petitioner facing trial in a case arising out of FIR No. 150/2021, registered at Police Station Udhampur for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 8/15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) being unsuccessful in his bail application moved before the Court of learned Sessions Judge Udhampur (for shot ‘the trial Court’) has moved this application for grant of bail primarily on the ground that the petitioner is HIV+ve patient as certified by the doctor.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while arguing the case for a while mentioned a judgment passed by this Court in case titled Jasvinder Singh vs. State of J&K, 2022 (1) JKJ 28, whereby in similar circumstances the petitioner suffering from HIV+ve, was granted bail.
3. The petitioner has been charged for having in his possession 1.5 Qtl Poppy Straw which falls within the commercial quantity, as such, rigor of Section 37 of NDPS Act with regard to bail is applicable in the case. The petitioner herein while moving application before the trial Court had not taken the ground of his ailment, as such, the trial Court has not been able to address on the point of his ailment to consider grant of bail. In the case relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the trial Court had already taken a view on medical ground pleaded in the application and rejected the bail application, therefore, this court was not in a position to appreciate the problem faced by the petitioner in that case.
4. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to consider the matter expeditiously on a motion for grant of bail by the petitioner taking medical ground in his petition.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent has stated no objection to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions urged at the Bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the application moved, if any, by the petitioner for grant of bail expeditiously preferably within ten days from the date of filing of such application.
7. Petition is accordingly, disposed of along with applications, if any.
Disposed of.
The court emphasized the consideration of the petitioner's medical condition in the bail application and the need for an expeditious decision by the trial court.
Grant of bail – While considering application for bail made by accused involved in offence under NDPS Act liberal approach ignoring mandate under Section 37 of NDPS Act is impermissible.
The court affirmed that individuals suffering from HIV/AIDS are entitled to humane treatment and may be granted bail even with criminal antecedents, considering the impact of incarceration on their h....
The court reaffirmed that bail under the NDPS Act requires strict adherence to Section 37(1)(b)(ii), emphasizing that health conditions alone do not justify bail in serious drug offenses.
The limitations on granting of bail specified in Section 37 of the NDPS Act are in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, and do not act as a blanket ban on the power of th....
The court established that the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not act as an absolute bar to granting bail on humanitarian grounds, such as serious medical conditions, allowing for judici....
Severity of the offence and potential danger to society are key factors in denying bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.