IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJAY DHAR, J.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Chand and Ors. - Respondents
MA No. 491 Of 2012, CM No. 1641 Of 2019[1/2019]
Decided On : 05-10-2023
Insurance - Employees Compensation Act - Transfer of Insured Vehicle and Liability of Insurance Company
Fact of the Case:
The claimants sought compensation for the death of an individual due to a motor vehicular accident. The Insurance Company challenged the award of compensation, arguing that it was not obliged to pay due to the transfer of the insured vehicle to a third party without proper transfer of insurance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the transfer of the insured vehicle had not been established and even if it had been transferred, the certificate of insurance and the policy would be deemed to have been transferred to the new owner, as per Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court also cited relevant case law to support this interpretation.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Insurance Company was liable to pay compensation to the claimants despite the transfer of the insured vehicle to a third party without proper transfer of insurance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act and relevant case law to establish that the certificate of insurance would be deemed to have been transferred to the new owner of the vehicle, and therefore, the Insurance Company was still liable to pay compensation.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Insurance Company was not eligible to be exonerated from its liability of paying the awarded sum to the claimants.
ORDER :
1. The appellant-Insurance Company has challenged award dated 12.09.2012 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation Act, Udhampur (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner), whereby an amount of Rs. 4,36,940/- has been awarded as compensation in favour of the claimants/respondent Nos. 1 to 5, to be payable by the appellant- Insurance Company.
2. It appears that respondent Nos. 1 to 5/claimants have filed a petition before the Commissioner seeking compensation on account of death of Sham Lal, who was stated to have died as a result of motor vehicular accident that took place on 09.04.2006, while the deceased was driving a vehicle No. JK14-5546. It was further claimed that the deceased was working under employment of respondent No. 6, the registered owner of the vehicle in question. The Commissioner on the basis of the evidence led by the parties, came to the conclusion that the deceased was working under employment of respondent No. 6 the registered owner of the vehicle in question and his death took place during the course of his employment. It was also found that the deceased was earning monthly wages of Rs. 4000/-. Since the vehicle in question was insured with the appellant- Insurance Company, it was saddled with liability to indemnify the insured.
3. The appellant-Insurance Company has challenged the impugned award primarily on the ground that the registered owner of the vehicle had transferred the vehicle in question to respondent No. 7 without getting the certificate of insurance transferred in favour of the said respondent. On this ground, it is urged that the appellant-Insurance Company was not obliged to pay compensation to the claimants. It has been claimed that the insured-respondent No. 6 has transferred the offending vehicle prior to the date of the accident without getting the certificate of insurance transferred in favour of the transferee and without intimation to the appellant/insurer. Therefore, according to the appellant, the registered owner of the vehicle did not have any insurable interest, as such, the Insurance policy ceased to be in force.
4. Heard and considered.
5. So far as assertion of the appellant-Insurance Company that the insured vehicle was transferred by its registered owner i.e. respondent No. 6 herein in favour of respondent No. 7 is concerned, the said assertion has not been established before the learned Commissioner. There is a clear finding recorded by the learned Commissioner that the offending vehicle was owned by respondent No. 6 at the time of the accident and its transfer in favour of respondent No. 7 has not been established. This finding of fact cannot be interfered by this Court in the present appeal, therefore, the contention of the appellant-Insurance Company that because transfer of the insured vehicle had taken place from respondent No. 6 to respondent No. 7 without transfer of the certificate of insurance and without intimation to the appellant-Insurance Company, is without any substance.
6. Even if it is assumed for the sake of arguments that the insured vehicle had been transferred by its registered owner i.e. respondent No. 6 in favour of respondent No. 7 prior to the date of the accident without getting the certificate of insurance transferred and without intimation to the appellant-Insurance Company, still then in terms of provisions contained in Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act, where a person who is holding a certificate of insurance in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XI of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, transfers the ownership of the said vehicle to another person, the certificate of insurance and the policy described in the certificate is deemed to have been transferred in favour of the person to whom the motor vehicle has been transferred with effect from the date of its transfer. Only the certificate of insurance, which has been issued in accordance with Chapter XI of the Motor Vehicles Act gets automatically transferred in the name of
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the certificate of insurance and the policy are deemed to have been transferred to the new owner ....
WORKMEN COMPENSATION - an insurer would not get insulated and the liability of the transferee of the vehicle in question gets indemnified on account of the contract indemnity and fidelity covering in....
The insurer is liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act even if the vehicle's ownership has been transferred, provided it was insured at the time of the accident.
Point of Law : Even though in law there would be a transfer of ownership of the vehicle, that by itself would not absolve the person in whose name the vehicle stands in the registration certificate, ....
The main legal point established is that the insurer is liable to pay compensation for an accident involving a vehicle, even if the vehicle has been transferred, based on the legal principle establis....
Registered owners of vehicles remain liable for compensation despite ownership transfer if not formally updated, and insurers must provide coverage for employees if appropriate premiums are paid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.