SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 250

SANJEEV KUMAR, MOHAN LAL
State of Jammu and Kashmir – Appellant
Versus
Gourav Rabotra, S/o. Sh. Kishori Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Dewakar Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

(Sanjeev Kumar, J.)

1. State of Jammu and Kashmir (now Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir) is in appeal against order and judgment of acquittal dated 02.07.2011 recorded by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kathua [“the trial court”] in file No. 10/Challan titled ‘State v. Gourav Rabotra.’

2. Before we advert to the grounds of challenge, reference to prosecution story would be appropriate.

3. On 18.04.2007, the police of Police Station, Basholi while being on regular petrol duty, put up a naka and intercepted a motorcycle “Yamaha Black” which was being driven by the respondent. On an enquiry, the respondent disclosed his name as Gourav Rabotra. The respondent was searched and on his search, one black bag containing 2000 capsules of Parvan Spas was recovered from his possession. The capsules were immediately seized and an FIR No. 25/2007 under Section 8/21/22 of the NDPS Act was registered. The investigation was taken up which ultimately culminated into presentation of Final Report against the respondent. The trial court, after hearing the prosecution and the respondent, framed charges under Section 8/21/22 of the NDPS Act. The respondent denied the charges and claimed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top