TASHI RABSTAN, MOHAN LAL
Ghulam Nabi – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tashi Rabstan, J.
1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29.05.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the appellant’s Writ Petition i.e. WP(Crl) No.15/2023 titled ‘Ghulam Nabi v. UT of J&K and Ors.’ seeking quashment of detention order No.23/PSA of 2022 dated 03.10.2022, issued by District Magistrate, Ramban, was dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the impugned judgment passed by the learned Single Judge dated 29.05.2023, inter alia, on the following grounds:
b. That it was brought to the kind notice of the writ court that the order of detention is based on the dossier forwarded to the respondent no.2 by the respondent no.3 where by the reference has been made alleged three (03) FIRs out of which one FIR’s at Police Station Banihal and Two FIRs at Police S
Abdul Latif Abdul Wahab Sheikh v. B. K. Jha and another [(1987) 2 SCC 22]
A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras [1950 SCR 88]
Kamleshwar Ishwar Das Patel V. Union of India and (1995) 4 SCC 51
Thahira Haris Etc. Etc. v. Government of Karnataka [AIR 2009 SC 2184]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of procedural safeguards and the detenue's right to be provided with the whole material on which the detention order is based in pre....
The right to be informed of the grounds of detention and to access all materials relevant to that detention is fundamental under Article 22(5) of the Constitution, and any failure to comply with thes....
The detention order must be based on compelling reasons, and the detaining authority must supply all material forming the basis of the detention to enable effective representation. Failure to do so r....
Preventive detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act requires the detaining authority to provide grounds for detention and adhere to procedural safeguards, but the subjective satisfacti....
Point of Law : The detenu has a right, under Article 22(5), to be furnished with particulars of grounds of his detention, sufficient to enable him to make a representation, which on being considered ....
Preventive detention vitiated by vague grounds lacking specifics, mechanical reproduction of police dossier showing non-application of mind, failure to supply material in understandable language, and....
The judgment established the importance of subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing a detention order, the limited scope of scrutiny under Article 226, and the distinction betwee....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.