SANJEEV KUMAR, MOHAN LAL
Baba Kali Dass Bharati S/o Kirpa Ram – Appellant
Versus
State through Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MOHAN LAL, J.
1. Appellants have assailed the judgment of conviction dated 15.11.2011 and order of sentence dated 18.11.2011 rendered by the court of Ld. Sessions Judge Jammu in case titled State vs. Baba Kali Dass Bharati and Another bearing File No. 12/Sessions, whereby, they have been convicted in FIR No. 27/2003 of Police Station R.S. Pura (Jammu) for commission of offence punishable u/s 302/34 RPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each.
2. Aggrieved of and dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment of conviction, appellants have assailed its legality, propriety and correctness and have sought its setting aside on the following grounds:
: Conviction can be recorded on the basis of statement of a solitary eye witness provided the witness is trustworthy.
The reliability of an injured eye-witness testimony and its corroboration by medical evidence are crucial in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and when witness reliability diminishes, conviction based solely on uncorroborated testimony cannot stand.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.