IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SANJAY DHAR, J.
Vikram Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Ors – Respondents
WP(C) No.2322 of 2019
Decided on : 02-08-2023
Mandamus - Businessman's Petition - J&K Cr.P.C, Sec. 561-A - Negotiable Instruments Act, Sec. 138 - RPC, Sec. 420, 467, 468 - Investigation into Extortion Racket - CBI Jurisdiction - Fair Investigation
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a businessman, sought a Writ of Mandamus to constitute a Special Investigation Team or transfer the case to CBI due to a complaint under Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He alleged an extortion racket involving false complaints by locals and sought fair investigation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that investigating agencies had thoroughly examined the allegations and established an extortion racket. It rejected the petitioner's plea to transfer the investigation to CBI, directing further investigation by the Economic Offences Wing of Crime Branch, Kashmir.
Issues: The issues involved the fairness of the investigation, the jurisdiction of the CBI, and the establishment of an extortion racket through false complaints.
Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that the power to transfer investigation to CBI is to be used sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances. It emphasized the need for fair investigation and directed further investigation by the Economic Offences Wing of Crime Branch, Kashmir.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Economic Offences Wing of Crime Branch, Kashmir, to undertake further investigation and transfer the investigation of another case to the same agency.
JUDGMENT :
1) The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court with the following prayers:
b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to expedite the probe and conclude the investigation of the case registered pursuant to the FIR supra and consequently update this Court about the stage of investigation and the material evidence collected so far along with the relevant record of the case.
2) As per case of the petitioner, he is a reputed businessman running a company M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. It has been submitted that during the course of his business activities, the petitioner came to know about the institution of a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in respect of a cheque bearing No. 997645 dated 21.08.2018 amounting to Rs.75.00 lacs, that was instituted before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (Mobile Magistrate) Anantnag. The complaint was lodged against the petitioner by one Ms. Sania Fayaz, attorney holder of one Pankaj Jain. It is submitted that the petitioner did have certain business transactions with said Pankaj Jain but the cheque in question had been stolen way back in the year 2014, as a consequence whereof, he had lodged a report with the police on 1st October 2014, and the same was converted into formal FIR bearing No.0732 dated 12th of November 2018. The petitioner is stated to have challenged the proceedings initiated against him in respect of the aforesaid cheque by way of a petition under Section 561-A of J&K Cr. P. C bearing CRMC No.479/2018.
3) According to the petitioner, while defending the aforesaid case, he came to know that a number of cases have been filed against non-state subjects at the hands of some locals operating in Anantnag, Kulgam and Qazigund and in most of the cases, complaints have been preferred by attorney holders acting for and on behalf of a fraudulent company known as “Host Finance & Investments Pvt. Ltd.” It has been submitted that in most of these cases, the complainants are Ms. Sania Fayaz and Ms. Lubna Bashir. It has been submitted that upon enquiries, the petitioner came to know that the aforenamed two persons were working in tandem on the instructions of Pankaj Jain, Director of the company M/S Host Finance. It was also learnt by the petitioner that these persons work as a team in various districts of Kashmir Valley and target well settled businessmen of the Country by instituting fake, false and fictitious complaints so as to extort money from the businessmen by taking advantage of the security situation in Kashmir valley, particularly in South Kashmir. The petitioner is stated to have lodged a complaint in this regard with respondent No. 3-Inspector General of Police, Kashmir Zone, a copy whereof has been annexed to the petition. A criminal complaint was also filed by the petitioner before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, that was transferred to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (3rd Additional Munsiff), Srinagar, that is stated to be pending adjudication.
4) On the directions of respondent No.3, FIR No.69/2019 stands registered at Police Station, Anantnag, for offences under Section 420, 467 and 468 of RPC and the investigation was entrusted to the Special Investigation Team headed by Deputy Superintendent of Police. It has been submitted
The judgment emphasizes the need for fair investigation and clarifies the exceptional circumstances for transferring investigation to the CBI.
The court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of allegations before transferring an investigation to CBI and highlighted the petitioner's failure to register an FIR or seek remedy under....
The court can direct a CBI investigation when local investigations are compromised, ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings.
The accused has no right to dictate the investigating agency or method of investigation, and the plea of alibi must be substantiated with cogent evidence.
The court established that the right to a fair investigation is fundamental, and when there are serious allegations of police misconduct, it may necessitate the transfer of the investigation to an in....
The court affirmed that senior officials cannot obstruct FIR registration and must adhere to legal protocols, emphasizing accountability in law enforcement.
Black money transaction - seeking investigation - Orders have been issued by Deputy Inspector General of Police without ascertaining factual details, Petitioner has not made any verification about co....
The court emphasized that FIR registration is mandatory for cognizable offences, rejecting locus standi as a barrier to filing complaints.
The court affirmed that a senior officer cannot avoid accountability for procedural lapses and that the transfer of investigation to the CBI is not warranted without exceptional circumstances.
The registration of multiple FIRs concerning the same incident is barred unless initiated by the court involved in the first FIR, ensuring adherence to procedural safeguards in criminal justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.