SANJAY DHAR
Irshad Ahmad Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) By this common judgment, afore-titled three writ petitions filed by the petitioners, are proposed to be disposed of.
2) By virtue of writ petition bearing OWP No.757/2018, the petitioners have challenged the provisions contained in Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the PMLA”). Challenge has also been thrown to proceedings initiated against the petitioners pursuant to ECIR/01/SRZO/2011 dated 29.04.2011, which are stated to be pending before the Designated Court.
3) In OWP No.820/2017, the petitioners have challenged the proceedings initiated against them pursuant to ECIR/01/SRZO/2011 dated 29.02.2011, as also the aforesaid ECIR.
4) Vide writ petition (OWP) No.1194/2011, the petitioners have challenged the order of summoning issued by respondent No.4-Director of Enforcement, against them with a further direction for restraining the respondents from interfering in the cases already investigated and prosecuted by the J&K Police.
5) It appears that the petitioners are facing trial before the Court of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, in a case arising out of FIR No.14/2009 for offences under Section 11, 17, 20 ULA(P) Act and Section 12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.