SANJAY DHAR
Kamal Nain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by filing two separate petitions. By virtue of CRMC No. 107/2014, the petitioner has challenged order dated 13.03.2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Forest Magistrate) Jammu, whereby on a compliant filed by the private respondent, directions have been issued for registration of FIR in light of the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs State of Utter Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1 as also the FIR bearing No. 6/2014 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B RPC read with Section 5(2) of J&K Prevention of Corruption Act registered pursuant to the aforesaid order. By virtue of CRM(M) No. 712/2022, the petitioner has challenged order dated 11.03.2014 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Forest Magistrate), Jammu in the aforesaid complaint filed by the private respondent, whereby the learned Magistrate has treated the report submitted by the Crime Branch Jammu pursuant to order dated 21.09.2013 of the said Magistrate as one under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code).
2. The facts emanating from the pleadings of t
Adalat Prasad vs Roop Lal Jindal
Darshan Singh Ram Krishan v State of Maharashtra
Dilwar Singh vs State of Delhi
K. V. Subbiah v. State of Mysore 1969 CrLJ 754
Lalita Kumari vs State of Utter Pradesh
Mona Panwar v High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.